Vetlugina T P, Androsova L V, Nikitina V B, Lobacheva O A, Perchatkina O E, Otman I N, Klyushnik T P
Mental Health Research Institute of Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Mental Health Research Center, Moscow, Russia.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2020;120(8):76-82. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202012008176.
To determine factors of innate and acquired immunity in adaptation disorders with a predominance of asthenic or anxiety-depressive syndrome.
Twenty-five patients with ICD-10 diagnosis of «Adaptation Disorders» (F43.2), including 9 with asthenic syndrome and 16 with anxiety-depressive syndrome, were examined. The control group consisted of 23 healthy individuals. The relative number of lymphocyte phenotypes was determined by flow cytometry; the concentration of IgM, IgG, IgA, aAB to S100b and MBP - by ELISA; CIC level - by the method of selective precipitation with PEG-6000; phagocytic activity of neutrophils by a test system with melamine-formaldehyde latex; activities of leukocyte elastase (LE) and α1-proteinase inhibitor (α1-PI) by a spectrophotometric method.
There were significant changes in the parameters of acquired immunity in the group with asthenic syndrome and those of innate immunity in the group with anxiety-depressive syndrome. An increase in α1-PI activity, in the total number of significant correlations between different immunological parameters, in the involvement of α1-PI in integration of acquired and innate immunity were observed in the anxiety-depressive group compared with the asthenic group.
The peculiarities of stress response in patients with leading anxiety-depressive syndrome are the high activity of α1-PI, which, along with the strengthening of correlation intersystem associations and the involvement of this protein in the integration of acquired and innate immunity, allows us to consider α1-PI as a criterion that improves the accuracy of diagnosis of the nature of the course of adaptation disorders.
确定以虚弱或焦虑抑郁综合征为主的适应障碍中先天免疫和后天免疫的因素。
对25例国际疾病分类第10版诊断为“适应障碍”(F43.2)的患者进行检查,其中9例为虚弱综合征患者,16例为焦虑抑郁综合征患者。对照组由23名健康个体组成。通过流式细胞术测定淋巴细胞表型的相对数量;通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测定IgM、IgG、IgA、抗S100b和髓鞘碱性蛋白的浓度;通过聚乙二醇-6000选择性沉淀法测定循环免疫复合物水平;通过三聚氰胺-甲醛乳胶测试系统测定中性粒细胞的吞噬活性;通过分光光度法测定白细胞弹性蛋白酶(LE)和α1-蛋白酶抑制剂(α1-PI)的活性。
虚弱综合征组的后天免疫参数和焦虑抑郁综合征组的先天免疫参数有显著变化。与虚弱组相比,焦虑抑郁组中α1-PI活性增加,不同免疫参数之间的显著相关性总数增加,α1-PI参与后天免疫和先天免疫的整合。
以焦虑抑郁综合征为主的患者应激反应的特点是α1-PI活性高,这与系统间关联的加强以及该蛋白参与后天免疫和先天免疫的整合一起,使我们能够将α1-PI视为提高适应障碍病程性质诊断准确性的一个标准。