Suppr超能文献

钌(II)、铑(III)和钯(II)催化的C-H官能化反应中氧化导向基团命运的计算研究

Computational Study on the Fate of Oxidative Directing Groups in Ru(II), Rh(III), and Pd(II) Catalyzed C-H Functionalization.

作者信息

Liu Siqi, Pu Maoping, Wu Yun-Dong, Zhang Xinhao

机构信息

College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China.

Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518132, P. R. China.

出版信息

J Org Chem. 2020 Oct 2;85(19):12594-12602. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c01775. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

Abstract

Activation of C-H bonds assisted by a directing group is indispensable in organic synthesis. Among them, utilizing oxidative directing groups that can serve as an internal oxidant to drive the M/M catalytic cycle has recently become a promising strategy. A survey of published reactions involving -alkoxyamides or -acyloxyamides reveals that not all N-O bonds act as an internal oxidant. We have therefore systematically investigated the effect of the oxidative groups on a model reaction catalyzed by Ru(II), Rh(III), and Pd(II) complexes. DFT calculations show that -methoxy and -acyloxy groups oxidize Ru(II) to Ru(IV) and Rh(III) to Rh(V), but cannot oxidize a cyclo-Pd(II) intermediate to Pd(IV). The stability of the metal imido intermediate (M = Ru, Rh, and Pd) controls whether the oxidation occurs or not. -Acyloxy groups show a more pronounced selectivity than -methoxy to oxidize Ru(II) and Rh(III) species, while no distinctive effect is observed for Pd(II).

摘要

在有机合成中,导向基团辅助的C-H键活化是必不可少的。其中,利用可作为内氧化剂驱动M/M催化循环的氧化导向基团最近已成为一种很有前景的策略。对已发表的涉及β-烷氧基酰胺或β-酰氧基酰胺的反应进行的调查表明,并非所有的N-O键都作为内氧化剂。因此,我们系统地研究了氧化基团对由Ru(II)、Rh(III)和Pd(II)配合物催化的模型反应的影响。密度泛函理论计算表明,β-甲氧基和β-酰氧基可将Ru(II)氧化为Ru(IV),将Rh(III)氧化为Rh(V),但不能将环钯(II)中间体氧化为Pd(IV)。金属亚氨基中间体(M = Ru、Rh和Pd)的稳定性控制着氧化反应是否发生。β-酰氧基在氧化Ru(II)和Rh(III)物种方面比β-甲氧基表现出更明显的选择性,而对于Pd(II)则未观察到明显影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验