Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Dec;80:105171. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105171. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
Powered ankle-foot prostheses were developed to replicate the mechanics of the biological ankle by providing positive work during the push-off phase of gait. However, the benefits of powered prostheses on improving overall human gait efficiency (usually quantified by metabolic cost) have not been consistently shown. Here, we have focused on the mechanical work produced at the prosthetic ankle and its interaction with the amputee's movement.
Five unilateral transtibial amputees walked on a treadmill using 1) a powered ankle-foot prosthesis and 2) their daily passive device. We determined the net ankle work and ankle work loops on the prosthesis-side to quantify the efficiency of the human-prosthesis physical interaction. We further studied peak propulsion timing and the posture of the amputee's lower limb and prosthesis as indicators of the human-prosthesis coordination. Comparisons were made between the passive and powered prosthesis conditions for each participant.
The powered prosthesis did not consistently increase net ankle work compared to each participant's passive device. For participants that lacked efficiency in interacting with the powered prosthesis, we observed 1) early prosthesis-side peak propulsion timing (≥ 4% earlier) and 2) a more vertical residual shank at the time of peak propulsion (> 2° more vertical) indicating that the human's limb movement and the prosthesis control during push-off were not well coordinated.
Results from this preliminary study highlight the need for future work to systematically quantify the coordination between the human and powered prosthesis and understand how such coordination at the joint level influences overall gait efficiency.
动力踝足假肢的设计目的是通过在步态的蹬离阶段提供正向功来模拟生物踝关节的力学特性。然而,动力假肢在提高整体人类步态效率(通常通过代谢成本来量化)方面的益处尚未得到一致证明。在这里,我们关注假肢踝关节产生的机械功及其与截肢者运动的相互作用。
五名单侧胫骨截肢者在跑步机上使用 1)动力踝足假肢和 2)他们日常使用的被动装置进行行走。我们确定了假肢侧的净踝功和踝功循环,以量化人体-假肢物理相互作用的效率。我们进一步研究了峰值推进时机和截肢者下肢和假肢的姿势,作为人体-假肢协调的指标。对每位参与者的被动和动力假肢条件进行了比较。
与每个参与者的被动装置相比,动力假肢并未一致增加净踝功。对于与动力假肢交互效率较低的参与者,我们观察到 1)更早的假肢侧峰值推进时机(≥4%更早)和 2)在峰值推进时更垂直的残肢(>2°更垂直),这表明人类肢体运动和蹬离时的假肢控制不协调。
这项初步研究的结果强调了未来需要系统地量化人体和动力假肢之间的协调,并了解关节水平的这种协调如何影响整体步态效率。