• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊部门进行 HIV 筛查的成本效益:系统评价。

Cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in emergency departments: a systematic review.

机构信息

Public Health Department, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2021 Oct;33(10):1243-1254. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1817299. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1080/09540121.2020.1817299
PMID:32933322
Abstract

In 2016 worldwide, 1.8 million people were newly infected with HIV. About 36.7 million had HIV but 14 million were unaware, did not seek treatment and were likely to infect others. Undiagnosed HIV infection is a major contributor to transmission. Therefore, screening is critical to prevention. Although CDC recommends routine screening in the emergency department (ED), implementation is not universal or sustained. Cost-effectiveness of ED-based screening could enhance implementation. We address the question: ? Using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of economic evaluations of ED-based HIV screening. We found 311 studies with 12 duplicates. We excluded 276 studies that did not conduct economic evaluations and another three for lack of quantitative data, leaving 20 articles for the full review. We reviewed cost-effectiveness ratios (CER), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), and average costs per diagnosis, quality-adjusted life years, averted transmissions and per patient linked to care. CER and ICER were below CDC thresholds indicating that HIV screening in the ED is cost-effective. Therefore, ED-based HIV screening should be widely implemented, supported and sustained as a cost-effective tool for combating HIV/AIDS.

摘要

2016 年,全球有 180 万人新感染艾滋病毒。约有 3670 万人感染艾滋病毒,但有 1400 万人未被发现,他们没有寻求治疗,可能会感染他人。未确诊的艾滋病毒感染是传播的主要原因。因此,筛查对于预防至关重要。尽管疾病预防控制中心建议在急诊室进行常规筛查,但并非普遍实施或持续实施。基于急诊室的筛查的成本效益可能会增强实施。我们提出了这样一个问题:利用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指导原则,我们对基于急诊室的艾滋病毒筛查的经济评估进行了系统回顾。我们发现了 311 项研究,其中有 12 项是重复的。我们排除了 276 项没有进行经济评估的研究,另外 3 项由于缺乏定量数据而被排除在外,留下 20 篇文章进行全面审查。我们审查了成本效益比(CER)、增量成本效益比(ICER)、每例诊断的平均成本、质量调整生命年、预防传播和每例患者与护理相关的成本。CER 和 ICER 均低于疾病预防控制中心的阈值,表明急诊室的艾滋病毒筛查具有成本效益。因此,应广泛实施、支持和维持基于急诊室的艾滋病毒筛查,将其作为防治艾滋病毒/艾滋病的一种具有成本效益的工具。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in emergency departments: a systematic review.在急诊部门进行 HIV 筛查的成本效益:系统评价。
AIDS Care. 2021 Oct;33(10):1243-1254. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1817299. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
Cost-effectiveness of targeted human immunodeficiency virus screening in an urban emergency department.城市急诊科目标性人类免疫缺陷病毒筛查的成本效益分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;18(7):745-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01110.x.
3
Moving Beyond Screening: How Emergency Departments Can Help Extinguish the HIV/AIDS Epidemic.超越筛查:急诊科如何助力消除艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):135-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.1.29100. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Novel emergency department registration kiosk for HIV screening is cost-effective.用于艾滋病毒筛查的新型急诊科挂号亭具有成本效益。
AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):483-6. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1099603. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
5
Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness.美国扩大HIV筛查——成本效益分析
N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):586-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042088.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: Results From the Pragmatic Randomized HIV Testing Using Enhanced Screening Techniques in Emergency Departments Trial.在急诊部门进行 HIV 筛查的成本效益:实用随机 HIV 测试使用增强筛查技术在急诊部门试验的结果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.在急诊科,咨询师与医务人员为基础的快速即时 HIV 筛查的资源利用和成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025575. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in STD clinics, emergency departments, and inpatient units: a model-based analysis.艾滋病病毒筛查在性病诊所、急诊部门和住院病房的成本效益:基于模型的分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019936. Epub 2011 May 20.
9
Programmatic cost evaluation of nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the emergency department.在急诊室进行非目标性即出式快速 HIV 筛查的计划性成本评估。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e81565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081565. eCollection 2013.
10
Cost-effectiveness of universal compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus among pregnant women in Chicago.芝加哥孕妇中普遍筛查与自愿筛查人类免疫缺陷病毒的成本效益比较。
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4):E54. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.e54.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing HIV incidence in the Southern United States through routine opt-out HIV screening.通过常规的主动退出式艾滋病毒筛查降低美国南部的艾滋病毒发病率。
AIDS. 2025 Sep 1;39(11):1632-1640. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004237. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Assessing Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in a Nurse-Driven, Opt-Out HIV Screening Program in the Emergency Department.评估急诊科参与护士主导的选择退出式艾滋病毒筛查项目的障碍和促进因素。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024 Nov 1;11:23333936241292735. doi: 10.1177/23333936241292735. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Feasibility and assessment of a comprehensive emergency department-based intervention for patients at risk of HIV.
基于综合急诊科的 HIV 高危患者全面干预措施的可行性和评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0310596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310596. eCollection 2024.
4
An Opt-Out Emergency Department Screening Intervention Leads to Major Increases in Diagnosis of Syphilis.一项选择退出式急诊科筛查干预措施导致梅毒诊断率大幅提高。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 10;11(9):ofae490. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae490. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Testing a persuasive health communication intervention (PHCI) for emergency department patients who declined rapid HIV/HCV screening: a randomised controlled trial study protocol.测试针对拒绝快速 HIV/HCV 筛查的急诊科患者的有说服力的健康传播干预 (PHCI):一项随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e089265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089265.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of rapid HIV testing in Canadian Emergency Departments: a mixed methods study.在加拿大急诊部门实施快速 HIV 检测的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
CJEM. 2024 Jul;26(7):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00716-1. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
National HIV and HCV Screening Rates for Hospitalized People who Use Drugs Are Suboptimal and Heterogeneous Across 11 US Hospitals.美国11家医院中,使用毒品的住院患者的全国艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒筛查率不理想且存在差异。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 16;11(5):ofae204. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae204. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: Results From the Pragmatic Randomized HIV Testing Using Enhanced Screening Techniques in Emergency Departments Trial.在急诊部门进行 HIV 筛查的成本效益:实用随机 HIV 测试使用增强筛查技术在急诊部门试验的结果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
9
Emergency department contribution to HCV elimination in the Iberian Peninsula.急诊科对伊比利亚半岛丙型肝炎病毒消除的贡献。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 4;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00570-5.
10
Rapid HIV testing in emergency departments: a paradigm shift.急诊科的快速艾滋病毒检测:一种范式转变。
CJEM. 2024 Jan;26(1):7-9. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00589-w. Epub 2023 Sep 15.