School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 30;287(1935):20201456. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1456. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
To be effective, animal colour signals must attract attention-and therefore need to be conspicuous. To understand the signal function, it is useful to evaluate their conspicuousness to relevant viewers under various environmental conditions, including when visual scenes are cluttered by objects of varying colour. A widely used metric of colour difference (Δ) is based on the receptor noise limited (RNL) model, which was originally proposed to determine when two similar colours appear different from one another, termed the discrimination threshold (or just noticeable difference). Estimates of the perceptual distances between colours that exceed this threshold-termed 'suprathreshold' colour differences-often assume that a colour's conspicuousness scales linearly with colour distance, and that this scale is independent of the direction in colour space. Currently, there is little behavioural evidence to support these assumptions. This study evaluated the relationship between Δ and conspicuousness in suprathreshold colours using an Ishihara-style test with a coral reef fish, . As our measure of conspicuousness, we tested whether fish, when presented with two colourful targets, preferred to peck at the one with a greater Δ - from the average distractor colour. We found the relationship between Δ and conspicuousness followed-- a sigmoidal function, with high Δ colours perceived as equally conspicuous. We found that the relationship between Δ and conspicuousness varied across colour space (i.e. for different hues). The sigmoidal detectability curve was little affected by colour variation in the background or when colour distance was calculated using a model that does not incorporate receptor noise. These results suggest that the RNL model may provide accurate estimates for perceptual distance for small suprathreshold distance colours, even in complex viewing environments, but must be used with caution with perceptual distances exceeding- -10 Δ.
为了有效,动物的颜色信号必须引人注目——因此需要显眼。为了理解信号功能,在各种环境条件下评估它们对相关观察者的显眼程度是很有用的,包括当视觉场景被不同颜色的物体所干扰时。一种广泛使用的色差度量(Δ)是基于受体噪声限制(RNL)模型,该模型最初是为了确定两个相似的颜色何时彼此看起来不同而提出的,称为辨别阈值(或只是可察觉的差异)。超过该阈值的颜色之间的感知距离的估计——称为“超阈值”颜色差异——通常假设颜色的显眼程度与颜色距离线性相关,并且该比例与颜色空间的方向无关。目前,几乎没有行为证据支持这些假设。本研究使用珊瑚礁鱼进行了伊舍哈风格测试,评估了超阈值颜色中的 Δ 与显眼程度之间的关系。作为我们显眼程度的衡量标准,我们测试了鱼在面对两个彩色目标时,是否更喜欢啄有更大 Δ 的那个——从平均干扰色来看。我们发现 Δ 与显眼程度之间的关系遵循——一个 S 型函数,高 Δ 颜色被认为同样显眼。我们发现 Δ 与显眼程度之间的关系在颜色空间中有所不同(即不同的色调)。在背景颜色发生变化或使用不包含受体噪声的模型计算颜色距离时,S 型可检测性曲线几乎不受影响。这些结果表明,RNL 模型即使在复杂的观察环境中,对于小超阈值距离的颜色,也可能提供对感知距离的准确估计,但对于超过- -10 Δ 的感知距离,必须谨慎使用。