Suppr超能文献

患者报告结局测量信息系统在全膝关节置换术患者的改善护理捆绑支付中是否可行?

Is the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Feasible in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients?

作者信息

Lawrie Charles M, Abu-Amer Wahid Y, Clohisy John C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.041. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several bundled payment plans, like the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative for total joint arthroplasty, have been introduced to decrease costs and improve clinical care. Measuring clinical outcomes with efficient, standardized methodologies is essential to determine the relative value of total joint arthroplasty care. We investigated feasibility and responsiveness of the recently developed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.

METHODS

We included patients with preoperative and 1-year PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression (DEP) scores who received unilateral primary TKA. Burden was assessed using the number of questions and time required for PROMIS completion. The minimum clinically important difference was defined as 5. Floor/ceiling effects were noted if more than 15% of patients responded with the lowest/highest possible score, respectively. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare categorical data. Analysis of variance was used for PROMIS comparisons.

RESULTS

In total, 172 knees (54 BPCI) were included. Floor effects were identified for DEP at baseline (non-BPCI) and follow-up (both groups), and for PI at follow-up only (BPCI). Patients required 140 seconds and 16 questions to answer all 3 PROMIS domains. Sixty-seven percent, 60%, and 44% of knees achieved minimum clinically important difference in PI, PF, and DEP scores respectively, with no significant difference between groups. The BPCI cohort was older (P < .001) with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = .028). There were no significant differences in scores between BPCI and non-BPCI patients.

CONCLUSION

PROMIS is feasible and time-efficient in BPCI patients undergoing primary TKA. There were no significant differences in outcomes between BPCI and non-BPCI knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

为降低成本并改善临床护理,已推出了多项捆绑支付计划,如全关节置换术的改善护理捆绑支付(BPCI)倡议。采用高效、标准化的方法来衡量临床结局对于确定全关节置换术护理的相对价值至关重要。我们研究了最近开发的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的可行性和反应性。

方法

我们纳入了接受单侧初次TKA且有术前和1年PROMIS身体功能(PF)、疼痛干扰(PI)和抑郁(DEP)评分的患者。使用完成PROMIS所需的问题数量和时间来评估负担。最小临床重要差异定义为5。如果分别有超过15%的患者以最低/最高可能分数作答,则记录地板效应/天花板效应。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较分类数据。方差分析用于PROMIS比较。

结果

共纳入172个膝关节(54个来自BPCI)。在基线时(非BPCI组)和随访时(两组)均发现DEP存在地板效应,仅在随访时(BPCI组)发现PI存在地板效应。患者回答所有3个PROMIS领域的问题需要140秒和16个问题。分别有67%、60%和44%的膝关节在PI、PF和DEP评分上达到最小临床重要差异,两组之间无显著差异。BPCI队列患者年龄更大(P <.001),美国麻醉医师协会评分更高(P =.028)。BPCI组和非BPCI组患者的评分无显著差异。

结论

PROMIS在接受初次TKA的BPCI患者中是可行且省时的。BPCI组和非BPCI组膝关节的结局无显著差异。

证据水平

III级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验