Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 15;10(9):e034025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034025.
We report on the acceptability, feasibility, dose-response relationship and adherence of two nutritional strategies to improve mood (multinutrient supplements; food-related behavioural activation (F-BA)) studied in a randomised controlled depression prevention trial (the Multi-country cOllaborative project on the rOle of Diet, Food-related behaviour, and Obesity in the prevention of Depression (MooDFOOD) Trial). We also assessed baseline determinants of adherence and assessed whether better adherence resulted in lower depressive symptoms.
Randomised controlled trial with a 2×2 factorial design conducted between 2015 and 2017.
Germany, the Netherlands, UK and Spain.
Community sample of 1025 overweight adults with elevated depressive symptoms without a current episode of major depressive disorder. Main eligibility criteria included age (18-75 years), being overweight or obese, and having at least mild depressive symptoms, shown by a Patient Health Questionnaire Score of ≥5. A total of 76% of the sample was retained at the 12-month follow-up.
Daily nutritional supplements versus pill placebo or an F-BA therapy, delivered in individual and group sessions versus no behavioural intervention over a 1-year period.
Primary outcome: self-reported acceptability of the interventions.
adherence and self-reported depressive symptoms.
Most participants reported that the F-BA was acceptable (83.61%), feasible to do (65.91%) and would recommend it to a friend (84.57%). Individual F-BA sessions (88.10%) were significantly more often rated as positive than group F-BA sessions (70.17%) and supplements (28.59%). There were statistically significant reductions in depressive symptoms for those who both adhered to the F-BA intervention and had a history of depression (B=-0.08, SE=0.03, p0.012) versus those who had no history of depression. Supplement intake had no effect on depressive symptoms irrespective of adherence.
F-BA may have scope for development as a depression prevention intervention and public health strategy but further refinement and testing are needed.
NCT02529423.
我们报告了两项旨在改善情绪的营养策略(多种营养素补充剂;与食物相关的行为激活(F-BA))的可接受性、可行性、剂量反应关系和依从性,这些策略在一项随机对照抑郁预防试验(多国合作项目饮食、与食物相关的行为和肥胖在预防抑郁中的作用(MooDFOOD)试验)中进行了研究。我们还评估了依从性的基线决定因素,并评估了是否更好的依从性会导致更低的抑郁症状。
2015 年至 2017 年进行的随机对照试验,采用 2×2 析因设计。
德国、荷兰、英国和西班牙。
1025 名超重且有抑郁症状但无当前重性抑郁障碍发作的社区成年人。主要入选标准包括年龄(18-75 岁)、超重或肥胖以及至少有轻度抑郁症状,表现在患者健康问卷得分≥5。在 12 个月随访时,76%的样本被保留。
每日营养补充剂与药丸安慰剂或 F-BA 治疗,在个体和小组会议中进行,与 1 年内无行为干预相比。
主要结局:干预措施的可接受性的自我报告。
依从性和自我报告的抑郁症状。
大多数参与者报告说,F-BA 是可以接受的(83.61%),易于实施(65.91%),并会向朋友推荐(84.57%)。个体 F-BA 课程(88.10%)明显比小组 F-BA 课程(70.17%)和补充剂(28.59%)更受好评。对于那些既坚持 F-BA 干预又有抑郁史的人(B=-0.08,SE=0.03,p<0.012),与那些没有抑郁史的人相比,抑郁症状有统计学上的显著减轻。无论依从性如何,补充剂摄入对抑郁症状均无影响。
F-BA 可能有作为预防抑郁干预和公共卫生策略的发展空间,但需要进一步的改进和测试。
NCT02529423。