Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Azienda USL Toscana Centro, InCHIANTI Study Group, Florence, Italy.
Psychol Med. 2020 Aug;50(11):1872-1883. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001958. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
Review findings on the role of dietary patterns in preventing depression are inconsistent, possibly due to variation in assessment of dietary exposure and depression. We studied the association between dietary patterns and depressive symptoms in six population-based cohorts and meta-analysed the findings using a standardised approach that defined dietary exposure, depression assessment and covariates.
Included were cross-sectional data from 23 026 participants in six cohorts: InCHIANTI (Italy), LASA, NESDA, HELIUS (the Netherlands), ALSWH (Australia) and Whitehall II (UK). Analysis of incidence was based on three cohorts with repeated measures of depressive symptoms at 5-6 years of follow-up in 10 721 participants: Whitehall II, InCHIANTI, ALSWH. Three a priori dietary patterns, Mediterranean diet score (MDS), Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010), and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet were investigated in relation to depressive symptoms. Analyses at the cohort-level adjusted for a fixed set of confounders, meta-analysis used a random-effects model.
Cross-sectional and prospective analyses showed statistically significant inverse associations of the three dietary patterns with depressive symptoms (continuous and dichotomous). In cross-sectional analysis, the association of diet with depressive symptoms using a cut-off yielded an adjusted OR of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.84-0.91) for MDS, 0.93 (0.88-0.98) for AHEI-2010, and 0.94 (0.87-1.01) for DASH. Similar associations were observed prospectively: 0.88 (0.80-0.96) for MDS; 0.95 (0.84-1.06) for AHEI-2010; 0.90 (0.84-0.97) for DASH.
Population-scale observational evidence indicates that adults following a healthy dietary pattern have fewer depressive symptoms and lower risk of developing depressive symptoms.
关于饮食模式在预防抑郁症中的作用的综述结果不一致,这可能是由于饮食暴露和抑郁症评估的差异所致。我们研究了六种基于人群的队列中饮食模式与抑郁症状之间的关联,并使用标准化方法对这些发现进行了荟萃分析,该方法定义了饮食暴露、抑郁评估和协变量。
纳入了六个队列的 23026 名参与者的横断面数据:意大利的 INCHIANTI、LASA、NESDA、荷兰的 HELIUS、澳大利亚的 ALSWH 和英国的白厅 II。在对 10721 名参与者进行了 5-6 年随访后,对重复测量的抑郁症状进行了发病率分析:白厅 II、INCHIANTI、ALSWH。在与抑郁症状的关系中,研究了三种预先设定的饮食模式,即地中海饮食评分(MDS)、替代健康饮食指数(AHEI-2010)和高血压饮食法(DASH)。在队列水平上进行分析时,调整了一组固定的混杂因素,使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
横断面和前瞻性分析显示,三种饮食模式与抑郁症状呈显著负相关(连续和二分法)。在横断面分析中,使用截止值来评估饮食与抑郁症状的关系时,MDS 的调整后的 OR 为 0.87(95%置信区间为 0.84-0.91),AHEI-2010 为 0.93(0.88-0.98),DASH 为 0.94(0.87-1.01)。前瞻性观察也观察到了类似的关联:MDS 为 0.88(0.80-0.96);AHEI-2010 为 0.95(0.84-1.06);DASH 为 0.90(0.84-0.97)。
人群规模的观察性证据表明,遵循健康饮食模式的成年人抑郁症状较少,发生抑郁症状的风险较低。