Choudhary Santosh, Sharma Sandeep, Kumari Indira, Kalluraya Swathi, Meena Khemraj, Dave Tanuj
Department of Anaesthesiology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;64(8):696-703. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_76_20. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause significant derangement of the haemodynamic parameters proving detrimental for some patients. Clonidine, an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, and melatonin, the pineal hormone, have been used for the attenuation of these haemodynamic responses. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of oral melatonin and clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.
In this prospective randomised double-blind study, 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients aged 20-60 years of either gender scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into Group M and Group C and orally received 6 mg of melatonin and 0.2 mg of clonidine, respectively, 120 min before the induction of anaesthesia. The haemodynamic parameters-heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and rate -pressure product(RPP) were recorded before and 120 min after the administration of the study drug, before induction, immediately after intubation and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 min following intubation. Sedation was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale. The qualitative and quantitative variables were analysed using Chi square test and unpaired student t test, respectively. For intragroup comparison of quantitative data, paired t test was applied. A value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
A significant difference was noted between the groups regarding HR and RPP 0, 1, 3 and 5 min after intubation. The Ramsay sedation score ranged between 2 and 3 at all time intervals.
Although both the drugs are effective, oral melatonin proved superior to oral clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without any side effects.
喉镜检查和气管插管会导致血流动力学参数显著紊乱,对某些患者有害。可乐定(一种α-2肾上腺素能受体激动剂)和褪黑素(松果体激素)已被用于减轻这些血流动力学反应。本研究旨在评估口服褪黑素和可乐定对减轻喉镜检查和插管时血流动力学反应的效果。
在这项前瞻性随机双盲研究中,60例年龄在20至60岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级、计划在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的患者,随机分为M组和C组,在麻醉诱导前120分钟分别口服6毫克褪黑素和0.2毫克可乐定。在给予研究药物前、给药后120分钟、诱导前、插管后即刻以及插管后1、3、5和10分钟记录血流动力学参数——心率(HR)、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压和率压积(RPP)。使用Ramsay镇静评分评估镇静情况。定性和定量变量分别采用卡方检验和非配对学生t检验进行分析。对于定量数据的组内比较,应用配对t检验。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
插管后0、1、3和5分钟时,两组在HR和RPP方面存在显著差异。所有时间点的Ramsay镇静评分在2至3之间。
虽然两种药物都有效,但口服褪黑素在减轻喉镜检查和气管插管的血流动力学反应方面优于口服可乐定,且无任何副作用。