• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' perception of user involvement in psychiatric outpatient treatment: Associations with patient characteristics and satisfaction.患者对精神科门诊治疗中患者参与度的感知:与患者特征和满意度的关联。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1477-1484. doi: 10.1111/hex.13132. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Rural-urban variation in user satisfaction with outpatient mental health services in Southern Malawi: a cross-sectional survey.农村-城市间马拉维南部门诊精神卫生服务用户满意度的差异:一项横断面调查。
J Ment Health. 2021 Apr;30(2):224-231. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1739243. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Exploring patterns in psychiatric outpatients' preferences for involvement in decision-making: a latent class analysis approach.探讨精神科门诊患者参与决策偏好模式:潜在类别分析方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03137-x.
4
Exploring pathways to outpatients' satisfaction with health care in Chinese public hospitals in urban and rural areas using patient-reported experiences.利用患者报告的体验探索城乡公立医疗机构门诊患者对医疗服务满意度的途径。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Feb 6;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0932-3.
5
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
6
Outpatient Satisfaction With Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in a Hospital Center: A Survey.医院中心门诊患者对整骨手法治疗的满意度:一项调查
Altern Ther Health Med. 2018 Sep;24(5):18-24.
7
Patients' experiences and clinicians' ratings of the quality of outpatient teams in psychiatric care units in Norway.挪威精神病护理单位门诊团队的患者体验及临床医生对其质量的评级。
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Aug;58(8):1102-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.8.1102.
8
To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.精神科患者在多大程度上参与他们的精神保健决策?与社会人口学、临床和心理学变量的关系。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2014 Dec;26(6):372-81. doi: 10.1017/neu.2014.21. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
Quality of life and other characteristics of Viennese mental health care users.维也纳精神卫生保健使用者的生活质量及其他特征。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;48(1):59-69. doi: 10.1177/002076402128783091.
10
Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists, and general practitioners.英格兰全科医疗中专科医生外展诊所的评估:患者、专科医生和全科医生的流程及可接受性
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):52-61. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.52.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare Professionals' Experiences with Patient Participation in a Mental Healthcare Centre: A Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员在精神保健中心参与患者护理的体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1965. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031965.
2
An Overview of Factors Influencing Psychiatric Out-Patient Satisfaction at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院影响精神科门诊患者满意度的因素概述。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):e25834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25834. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Improving Customisation in Clinical Pathways by Using a Modular Perspective.采用模块化视角改进临床路径的定制化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21):11129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111129.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care.患者和临床医生对精神科专科治疗抑郁、焦虑障碍和强迫症的治疗决策共享决策的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):645-658. doi: 10.1111/jep.13285. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: Patients´ preferences and associated factors.门诊精神障碍患者的共同决策:患者的偏好和相关因素。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1200-1209. doi: 10.1111/jep.13246. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Relationships and responsiveness in the psychological treatment of trauma: The tragedy of the APA Clinical Practice Guideline.创伤心理治疗中的关系与回应性:APA 临床实践指南的悲剧。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2019 Sep;56(3):391-399. doi: 10.1037/pst0000228. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
4
Meta-analyses of the relation of goal consensus and collaboration to psychotherapy outcome.目标共识和合作与心理治疗结果关系的元分析。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Dec;55(4):372-383. doi: 10.1037/pst0000170.
5
Service users' views regarding user involvement in mental health services: A qualitative study.服务使用者对用户参与心理健康服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Oct;32(5):695-701. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Shared decision-making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring: results of a cluster randomised-controlled trial.使用常规结果监测进行精神卫生保健中的共同决策:一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;54(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1589-8. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
7
Supported decision-making from the perspectives of mental health service users, family members supporting them and mental health practitioners.从精神卫生服务使用者、支持他们的家庭成员和精神卫生从业者的角度来看支持性决策。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;52(9):826-833. doi: 10.1177/0004867418784177. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis.参与精神卫生保健:一项定性元综合分析
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Nov 7;11:67. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0174-y. eCollection 2017.
9
Attitudes of mental health professionals towards service user involvement.心理健康专业人员对服务使用者参与的态度。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):681-689. doi: 10.1111/scs.12495. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
10
Incorporating shared decision making in mental health care requires translating knowledge from implementation science.将共同决策纳入精神卫生保健需要转化实施科学中的知识。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):160-161. doi: 10.1002/wps.20418.

患者对精神科门诊治疗中患者参与度的感知:与患者特征和满意度的关联。

Patients' perception of user involvement in psychiatric outpatient treatment: Associations with patient characteristics and satisfaction.

机构信息

Centre for Crisis Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1477-1484. doi: 10.1111/hex.13132. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13132
PMID:32935451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7752195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The patient's right to be involved in treatment decisions is anchored in guidelines and legislation in many countries. Previous research suggests challenges in the implementation of user involvement across different areas of health care, including mental health. However, little is known about psychiatric outpatients' experiences of being involved in their treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how psychiatric outpatients after treatment rate the degree to which they were included in the treatment and explore the associations between perceived user involvement, demographic characteristics of the sample and patient satisfaction.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The sample consisted of 188 psychiatric outpatients (67% female, mean age 42.2 years) who were discharged in the two years prior to data collection.

MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED

Perceived user involvement in psychiatric outpatient treatment and patient satisfaction as measured by the Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire.

RESULTS

About half of the participants rated the overall degree of involvement in their treatment as high or very high. The lowest percentage of participants reporting high or very high involvement was found for sufficient information to contribute to treatment decisions (36%). Female gender, higher education and, to a small degree, younger age were associated with more involvement. Perceived user involvement was strongly associated with treatment satisfaction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that user involvement in psychiatric outpatient treatment can be improved. Patient information that facilitates user involvement should be given more attention.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The hospital's user panel was involved in the development of items assessing user involvement.

摘要

背景

在许多国家,患者参与治疗决策的权利都有相关指导原则和立法作为依据。先前的研究表明,在包括精神卫生在内的不同医疗保健领域,用户参与的实施都存在挑战。然而,人们对精神科门诊患者参与治疗的体验知之甚少。

目的

调查治疗后的精神科门诊患者对自身参与治疗程度的评价,并探讨感知到的用户参与度与样本人口统计学特征和患者满意度之间的关系。

设计

横断面研究。

设置和参与者

该样本由 188 名精神科门诊患者(67%为女性,平均年龄 42.2 岁)组成,他们在数据收集前的两年内出院。

主要变量

精神科门诊患者治疗中的感知用户参与度和患者满意度,分别由精神科门诊患者体验问卷进行测量。

结果

约一半的参与者对其治疗总体参与程度评价较高或非常高。报告高度或非常高度参与度的患者比例最低的是有足够的信息来帮助做出治疗决策(36%)。女性、较高的教育程度,以及在一定程度上较年轻的年龄与更高的参与度相关。感知到的用户参与度与治疗满意度密切相关。

讨论和结论

研究结果表明,精神科门诊患者的参与度可以进一步提高。应更加关注有助于患者参与的患者信息。

患者或公众贡献

医院的用户小组参与了评估用户参与度的项目的制定。