Reilly Jennifer R, Gabbe Belinda J, Brown Wendy A, Hodgson Carol L, Myles Paul S
Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2021 May;91(5):860-870. doi: 10.1111/ans.16255. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Risk prediction tools can be used in the perioperative setting to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from increased surveillance and monitoring in the postoperative period, to aid shared decision-making, and to benchmark risk-adjusted hospital performance. We evaluated perioperative risk prediction tools relevant to an Australian context.
A systematic review of perioperative mortality risk prediction tools used for adults undergoing inpatient noncardiac surgery, published between 2011 and 2019 (following an earlier systematic review). We searched Medline via OVID using medical subject headings consistent with the three main areas of risk, surgery and mortality/morbidity. A similar search was conducted in Embase. Tools predicting morbidity but not mortality were excluded, as were those predicting a composite outcome that did not report predictive performance for mortality separately. Tools were also excluded if they were specifically designed for use in cardiac or other highly specialized surgery, emergency surgery, paediatrics or elderly patients.
Literature search identified 2568 studies for screening, of which 19 studies identified 21 risk prediction tools for inclusion.
Four tools are candidates for adapting in the Australian context, including the Surgical Mortality Probability Model (SMPM), Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM), Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) and NZRISK. SORT has similar predictive performance to POSPOM, using only six variables instead of 17, contains all variables of the SMPM, and the original model developed in the UK has already been successfully adapted in New Zealand as NZRISK. Collecting the SORT and NZRISK variables in a national surgical outcomes study in Australia would present an opportunity to simultaneously investigate three of our four shortlisted models and to develop a locally valid perioperative mortality risk prediction model with high predictive performance.
风险预测工具可用于围手术期,以识别那些可能从术后加强监测中获益的高风险患者,辅助共同决策,并为风险调整后的医院绩效设定基准。我们评估了与澳大利亚背景相关的围手术期风险预测工具。
对2011年至2019年期间发表的用于接受住院非心脏手术的成人围手术期死亡率风险预测工具进行系统评价(继早期系统评价之后)。我们通过OVID在Medline中检索,使用与风险、手术和死亡率/发病率三个主要领域一致的医学主题词。在Embase中进行了类似的检索。排除仅预测发病率而非死亡率的工具,以及那些预测综合结局但未单独报告死亡率预测性能的工具。如果工具是专门为心脏或其他高度专业化手术、急诊手术、儿科或老年患者设计的,也将其排除。
文献检索确定了2568项研究用于筛选,其中19项研究确定了21种风险预测工具纳入。
有四种工具可在澳大利亚背景下进行调整,包括手术死亡概率模型(SMPM)、术前预测术后死亡率评分(POSPOM)、手术结局风险工具(SORT)和新西兰风险评估模型(NZRISK)。SORT与POSPOM具有相似的预测性能,仅使用六个变量而非十七个,包含SMPM的所有变量,并且在英国开发的原始模型已在新西兰成功改编为NZRISK。在澳大利亚的一项全国性手术结局研究中收集SORT和NZRISK变量,将提供一个机会,同时研究我们入围的四个模型中的三个,并开发一个具有高预测性能的本地有效围手术期死亡率风险预测模型。