• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于通过机器学习预测手术风险的“患者优化器”(POP)算法的开发与验证

Development and validation of 'Patient Optimizer' (POP) algorithms for predicting surgical risk with machine learning.

作者信息

Kowadlo Gideon, Mittelberg Yoel, Ghomlaghi Milad, Stiglitz Daniel K, Kishore Kartik, Guha Ranjan, Nazareth Justin, Weinberg Laurence

机构信息

Atidia Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02463-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02463-w
PMID:38468330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10929113/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-operative risk assessment can help clinicians prepare patients for surgery, reducing the risk of perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, readmission and mortality. Further, it can facilitate collaborative decision-making and operational planning.

OBJECTIVE

To develop effective pre-operative risk assessment algorithms (referred to as Patient Optimizer or POP) using Machine Learning (ML) that predict the development of post-operative complications and provide pilot data to inform the design of a larger prospective study.

METHODS

After institutional ethics approval, we developed a base model that encapsulates the standard manual approach of combining patient-risk and procedure-risk. In an automated process, additional variables were included and tested with 10-fold cross-validation, and the best performing features were selected. The models were evaluated and confidence intervals calculated using bootstrapping. Clinical expertise was used to restrict the cardinality of categorical variables (e.g. pathology results) by including the most clinically relevant values. The models were created with logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient-boosted trees using XGBoost (Chen and Guestrin, 2016). We evaluated performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Data was obtained from a metropolitan university teaching hospital from January 2015 to July 2020. Data collection was restricted to adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 11,475 adult admissions were included. The performance of XGBoost and LR was very similar across endpoints and metrics. For predicting the risk of any post-operative complication, kidney failure and length-of-stay (LOS), POP with XGBoost achieved an AUROC (95%CI) of 0.755 (0.744, 0.767), 0.869 (0.846, 0.891) and 0.841 (0.833, 0.847) respectively and AUPRC of 0.651 (0.632, 0.669), 0.336 (0.282, 0.390) and 0.741 (0.729, 0.753) respectively. For 30-day readmission and in-patient mortality, POP with XGBoost achieved an AUROC (95%CI) of 0.610 (0.587, 0.635) and 0.866 (0.777, 0.943) respectively and AUPRC of 0.116 (0.104, 0.132) and 0.031 (0.015, 0.072) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The POP algorithms effectively predicted any post-operative complication, kidney failure and LOS in the sample population. A larger study is justified to improve the algorithm to better predict complications and length of hospital stay. A larger dataset may also improve the prediction of additional specific complications, readmission and mortality.

摘要

背景

术前风险评估有助于临床医生让患者为手术做好准备,降低围手术期并发症、住院时间、再入院率和死亡率的风险。此外,它还可以促进共同决策和手术规划。

目的

使用机器学习(ML)开发有效的术前风险评估算法(称为患者优化器或POP),以预测术后并发症的发生,并提供试点数据,为更大规模的前瞻性研究设计提供参考。

方法

经机构伦理批准后,我们开发了一个基础模型,该模型概括了结合患者风险和手术风险的标准手动方法。在一个自动化过程中,纳入了其他变量,并进行10折交叉验证测试,选择表现最佳的特征。使用自抽样法对模型进行评估并计算置信区间。利用临床专业知识,通过纳入最具临床相关性的值来限制分类变量(如病理结果)的基数。使用逻辑回归(LR)和基于XGBoost的极端梯度提升树创建模型(Chen和Guestrin,2016年)。我们使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和精确召回率曲线下面积(AUPRC)评估性能。数据取自2015年1月至2020年7月一家大都市大学教学医院。数据收集仅限于接受择期手术的成年患者。

结果

共纳入11475例成人住院病例。XGBoost和LR在各个终点和指标上的表现非常相似。对于预测任何术后并发症、肾衰竭和住院时间(LOS)的风险,基于XGBoost的POP的AUROC(95%CI)分别为0.755(0.744,0.767)、0.869(0.846,0.891)和0.841(0.833,0.847),AUPRC分别为0.651(0.632,0.669)、0.336(0.282,0.390)和0.741(0.729,0.753)。对于30天再入院率和住院死亡率,基于XGBoost的POP的AUROC(95%CI)分别为0.610(0.587,0.635)和0.866(0.777,0.943),AUPRC分别为0.116(0.104,0.132)和0.031(0.015,0.072)。

结论

POP算法有效地预测了样本人群中的任何术后并发症、肾衰竭和住院时间。有必要进行更大规模的研究来改进算法,以更好地预测并发症和住院时间。更大的数据集也可能改善对其他特定并发症、再入院率和死亡率的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/3b44195af305/12911_2024_2463_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/67f65e76700e/12911_2024_2463_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/e0db2bc552a5/12911_2024_2463_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/ac955cbd8ab4/12911_2024_2463_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/ff6b74a1558b/12911_2024_2463_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/3d32555487cf/12911_2024_2463_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/293c70c77b74/12911_2024_2463_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/edf80d782387/12911_2024_2463_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/653887fed375/12911_2024_2463_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/bc4ca3159ab0/12911_2024_2463_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/3b44195af305/12911_2024_2463_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/67f65e76700e/12911_2024_2463_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/e0db2bc552a5/12911_2024_2463_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/ac955cbd8ab4/12911_2024_2463_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/ff6b74a1558b/12911_2024_2463_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/3d32555487cf/12911_2024_2463_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/293c70c77b74/12911_2024_2463_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/edf80d782387/12911_2024_2463_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/653887fed375/12911_2024_2463_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/bc4ca3159ab0/12911_2024_2463_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10929113/3b44195af305/12911_2024_2463_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of 'Patient Optimizer' (POP) algorithms for predicting surgical risk with machine learning.用于通过机器学习预测手术风险的“患者优化器”(POP)算法的开发与验证
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02463-w.
2
Machine learning methods to predict 30-day hospital readmission outcome among US adults with pneumonia: analysis of the national readmission database.机器学习方法预测美国成年人肺炎 30 天内住院再入院结局:国家再入院数据库分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01995-3.
3
Predictive modeling for 14-day unplanned hospital readmission risk by using machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的 14 天内非计划性住院再入院风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01639-y.
4
A simple machine learning model for the prediction of acute kidney injury following noncardiac surgery in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study.一种用于预测老年非心脏手术后急性肾损伤的简单机器学习模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05148-1.
5
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Precision medicine for traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries: accessible and interpretable machine learning models to predict individualized in-hospital outcomes.创伤性颈脊髓损伤的精准医学:可及且可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测个体化的院内结局。
Spine J. 2023 Dec;23(12):1750-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Impact of Intraoperative Data on Risk Prediction for Mortality After Intra-Abdominal Surgery.术中数据对腹部手术后死亡率风险预测的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Jan 1;134(1):102-113. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005694.
8
Clinical Timing-Sequence Warning Models for Serious Bacterial Infections in Adults Based on Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.基于机器学习的成人严重细菌感染临床时间序列预警模型:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 18;25:e45515. doi: 10.2196/45515.
9
Predicting serious postoperative complications and evaluating racial fairness in machine learning algorithms for metabolic and bariatric surgery.预测代谢和减重手术中机器学习算法的严重术后并发症,并评估其种族公平性。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Nov;20(11):1056-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
10
Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.腰椎融合术后主要并发症和再入院的预测:一种机器学习驱动的方法。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e227-e234. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.080. Epub 2021 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive model for live birth outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a comparative analysis of logistic regression and machine learning approaches.单倍体冷冻胚胎移植活产结局的预测模型:逻辑回归与机器学习方法的比较分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03524-3.
2
Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review for Clinicians.机器学习在预测癌症患者围手术期结局中的应用:临床医生的叙述性综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 May 11;31(5):2727-2747. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050207.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of elderly patients at risk for 30-day readmission: Clinical insight beyond big data prediction.识别有30天再入院风险的老年患者:超越大数据预测的临床洞察。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):3743-3753. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13495. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
2
Coagulation Status and Surgical Approach as Predictors of Postoperative Anemia in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study.凝血状态和手术方式作为胸外科手术患者术后贫血的预测因素:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 21;8:744810. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.744810. eCollection 2021.
3
Use of Machine Learning to Develop and Evaluate Models Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Data to Identify Risks of Postoperative Complications.
使用机器学习,结合术前和术中数据开发和评估模型,以识别术后并发症的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212240. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2240.
4
Development and validation of an interpretable neural network for prediction of postoperative in-hospital mortality.用于预测术后院内死亡率的可解释神经网络的开发与验证
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jan 8;4(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00377-1.
5
Can the Charlson Comorbidity Index be used to predict the ASA grade in patients undergoing spine surgery?接受脊柱手术的患者,Charlson 合并症指数能否用于预测 ASA 分级?
Eur Spine J. 2020 Dec;29(12):2941-2952. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06595-1. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Systematic review of perioperative mortality risk prediction models for adults undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery.对接受住院非心脏手术的成年人围手术期死亡风险预测模型的系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 May;91(5):860-870. doi: 10.1111/ans.16255. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index predicts survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients after curative resection.年龄校正的Charlson合并症指数可预测肝内胆管癌患者根治性切除术后的生存率。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(7):487. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.23.
8
Preventing Hospital Readmissions: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on "Impactibility" Beyond EHR 30-Day Readmission Risk Prediction.预防医院再入院:医疗保健提供者对 EHR 30 天再入院风险预测之外的“可影响性”的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1484-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05739-9. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
The application of unsupervised deep learning in predictive models using electronic health records.无监督深度学习在电子健康记录预测模型中的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00923-1.
10
Machine Learning Prediction of Postoperative Emergency Department Hospital Readmission.机器学习预测术后急诊再次住院。
Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):968-980. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003140.