• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留耻骨后尿道间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后的盆腔解剖学特点:有利于早期恢复尿控症状。

Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms.

机构信息

Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Urology, Nagoya East Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 Mar;35(3):296-304. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0463. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0463
PMID:32935558
Abstract

To elucidate factors contributing to early urinary continence recovery after retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) by evaluating postoperative pelvic anatomical features between RS-RARP and conventional RARP (CON-RARP). We retrospectively examined 50 men who underwent RS-RARP ( = 25; the RS-RARP group) and CON-RARP ( = 25; the CON-RARP group) between October 2017 and June 2018. Perioperative outcomes and postoperative urinary continence were assessed in both groups. Anatomical features including the bladder neck-to-pubic symphysis ratio (determined from cystograms) and membranous urethral length (MUL) (determined from magnetic resonance imaging) were evaluated. The daily urinary incontinence rate at discharge was significantly lower in the RS-RARP group than in the CON-RARP group (0.046 [range: 0.014-0.160] 0.357 [range: 0.139-0.616],  < 0.001). Postoperative urinary continence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 80%, 92%, 96%, and 96% in the RS-RARP group and 24%, 40%, 68%, and 84% in the CON-RARP group, respectively ( < 0.001). The urgency scores in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire at 1 and 3 months were significantly lower in the RS-RARP than in the CON-RARP group ( = 0.028 and 0.033, respectively). The quality of life (QOL) indices were more significantly improved in the RS-RARP group than in the CON-RARP group 1 month ( = 0.027) and 3 months ( = 0.045) postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that a postoperative MUL of 12.1 mm (area under the curve: 0.852) was the optimal cutoff value predictive of continence recovery after 1 month. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that RS-RARP (odds ratio [OR]: 23.6;  < 0.001) and prostate volume (OR: 0.926;  = 0.049) were the independent factors of a longer MUL. RS-RARP results in an early continence recovery and a better urgency score in the IPSS by suppressing the descent of the bladder and maintaining a long MUL. RS-RARP may contribute to a better QOL recovery after RARP.

摘要

为了通过评估 Retzius 保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 (RS-RARP) 后骨盆解剖特征来阐明导致术后早期尿控恢复的因素,我们回顾性地检查了 50 名于 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受 RS-RARP( = 25;RS-RARP 组)和常规 RARP(CON-RARP; = 25;CON-RARP 组)的男性。对两组患者的围手术期结果和术后尿控情况进行评估。评估了包括膀胱颈耻骨联合比(通过膀胱造影确定)和膜性尿道长度(MUL)(通过磁共振成像确定)在内的解剖特征。RS-RARP 组患者出院时的每日尿失禁率明显低于 CON-RARP 组(0.046 [范围:0.014-0.160] vs. 0.357 [范围:0.139-0.616], < 0.001)。RS-RARP 组术后 1、3、6 和 12 个月的尿控率分别为 80%、92%、96%和 96%,CON-RARP 组分别为 24%、40%、68%和 84%( < 0.001)。RS-RARP 组的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)问卷中的紧迫性评分在 1 个月和 3 个月时明显低于 CON-RARP 组( = 0.028 和 0.033)。1 个月( = 0.027)和 3 个月( = 0.045)时,RS-RARP 组的生活质量(QOL)指数明显改善。受试者工作特征分析显示,术后 MUL 为 12.1 mm(曲线下面积:0.852)是预测术后 1 个月内恢复控尿的最佳截断值。多变量分析表明,RS-RARP(比值比 [OR]:23.6; < 0.001)和前列腺体积(OR:0.926; = 0.049)是 MUL 较长的独立因素。RS-RARP 通过抑制膀胱下降和保持较长的 MUL,导致早期尿控恢复和 IPSS 中的紧迫性评分降低。RS-RARP 可能有助于 RARP 后更好地恢复 QOL。

相似文献

1
Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms.保留耻骨后尿道间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后的盆腔解剖学特点:有利于早期恢复尿控症状。
J Endourol. 2021 Mar;35(3):296-304. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0463. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Impact of Bladder Neck Angle Measured by Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Midterm Recovery of Urinary Continence in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.术后磁共振成像测量的膀胱颈角度对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后患者中期尿控恢复的影响。
J Endourol. 2021 Nov;35(11):1610-1615. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0071. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
4
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
5
Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.传统和保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术术后功能和癌症控制评估:通过倾向评分匹配比较选择病例。
Prostate. 2023 Jun;83(8):773-780. doi: 10.1002/pros.24516. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
7
Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.保留耻骨前列腺韧带与标准机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术的比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;46(5):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.比较传统和保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后尿控和尿失禁类型。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Aug;42(6):1411-1420. doi: 10.1002/nau.25193. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:一项为期19个月随访的前瞻性对照研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):586-594. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03830-8. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Membranous urethral length is the single independent predictor of urinary continence recovery at 12 months following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后 12 个月时,膜部尿道长度是尿控恢复的唯一独立预测因素。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 29;18(1):230. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01986-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of transperitoneal anterior, retzius-sparing, extraperitoneal, transvesical and perineal approaches on urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.经腹膜前入路、保留Retzius间隙的腹膜外入路、经膀胱入路和会阴入路对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的影响:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00943-2.
2
Membranous urethral length is the single independent predictor of urinary continence recovery at 12 months following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后 12 个月时,膜部尿道长度是尿控恢复的唯一独立预测因素。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 29;18(1):230. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01986-8.
3
Postoperative Bladder Neck to Pubic Symphysis Ratio Predictive for De Novo Overactive Bladder after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.术后膀胱颈至耻骨联合比例对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后新发膀胱过度活动症具有预测作用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;13(20):3173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203173.
4
Membranous urethral length measurement on preoperative MRI to predict incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a literature review towards a proposal for measurement standardization.术前 MRI 测量膜部尿道长度预测根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁:测量标准化建议的文献回顾。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2621-2640. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10180-7. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助前列腺根治术与传统机器人辅助前列腺根治术的疗效比较:KSER 更新系列系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0268182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268182. eCollection 2022.
6
Investigating the mechanism underlying urinary continence using dynamic MRI after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.应用保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后动态 MRI 研究尿控机制。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):3975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07800-5.
7
Comparison of Retzius-sparing and conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding continence and sexual function: an updated meta-analysis.保留耻骨后间隙与传统机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术在控尿和性功能方面的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Mar;25(1):47-54. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00459-5. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis.保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与传统机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 30;8:738421. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.738421. eCollection 2021.
9
The impact of transition from conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multivariate analysis.从传统机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术过渡到保留耻骨后间隙机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的影响:一项回顾性多变量分析。
Indian J Urol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):140-146. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_414_20. Epub 2021 Apr 1.