Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin;Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Binshuixi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Department of Cancer Prevention, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Sep 16;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00506-y.
We compared the ultrasound features, superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and micro vessel density (MVD) of pleomorphic adenoma (PA), Warthin's tumor (WT) and basal cell adenoma (BCA) to explore the clinic value of SMI in differential diagnosis of benign tumors of parotid gland.
The vascular distributions and grade by color doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and SMI, as well as vascular index (VI) of 249 parotid gland masses from 217 patients were analyzed.
The internal echogenicity of BCA are more homogeneous in comparing with WT and PA(P < 0.05). By SMI, the vascular distribution and vascular grade in PA were mainly peripheral (33.1%) and avascular (25.7%), Grade 1 (27.8%) and Grade 0 (25.7%). WT were mainly central (31.3%) and mixed distribution (34.9%), in Grade 3 (37.3%) and Grade 2 (36.2%). BCA was mainly peripheral (33.3%) and mixed distribution (33.3%), in Grade 2 (33.3%) and Grade 3 (33.3%). The overall detection rate of SMI for vascular Grade 2 and 3 was significantly higher than that of CDFI (P < 0.05). Both VI and MVD were lowest in PA, highest in WT (P < 0.001). The VI by SMI was correlated with MVD (P < 0.001). The correlation index between vascular distribution and grade by SMI and MVD were significantly higher than CDFI.
SMI can provide low-velocity blood flow information, which is helpful for the differential diagnosis of common benign tumors of parotid gland, and is expected to be more widely used.
我们比较了多形性腺瘤(PA)、沃辛瘤(WT)和基底细胞腺瘤(BCA)的超声特征、超级微血管成像(SMI)和微血管密度(MVD),以探讨 SMI 在鉴别腮腺良性肿瘤中的临床价值。
分析了 217 例 249 个腮腺肿块的彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)和 SMI 的血管分布和分级,以及血管指数(VI)。
与 WT 和 PA 相比,BCA 的内部回声更均匀(P<0.05)。在 SMI 中,PA 的血管分布和血管分级主要为外周(33.1%)和无血管(25.7%),分级 1(27.8%)和分级 0(25.7%)。WT 主要为中央(31.3%)和混合分布(34.9%),分级 3(37.3%)和分级 2(36.2%)。BCA 主要为外周(33.3%)和混合分布(33.3%),分级 2(33.3%)和分级 3(33.3%)。SMI 对血管分级 2 和 3 的总检出率明显高于 CDFI(P<0.05)。PA 的 VI 和 MVD 最低,WT 最高(P<0.001)。SMI 的 VI 与 MVD 相关(P<0.001)。SMI 的血管分布和分级与 MVD 的相关指数明显高于 CDFI。
SMI 可提供低速血流信息,有助于鉴别腮腺常见良性肿瘤,有望得到更广泛的应用。