Suppr超能文献

基于技术与面对面存款合同治疗促进身体活动。

Technology-based versus in-person deposit contract treatments for promoting physical activity.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Florida.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Sep;53(4):1904-1921. doi: 10.1002/jaba.776. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Abstract

Deposit contracts involve participants depositing their own money and earning it back contingent on behavior change. Deposit contracts are empirically supported treatments for promoting health behavior, but they have a history of poor uptake. We compared the effectiveness and acceptability of technology-based versus in-person deposit contracts for promoting physical activity with 12 individuals. Participants' daily step counts were monitored using Fitbits across 6 weeks, and treatment preferences were assessed at the end of the study. The 2 types of treatments were equally effective in increasing physical activity, but the technology-based deposit contracts were preferred by most participants. Most participants also reported that their preference was related to convenience. Technology-based implementation may be one way to improve deposit contract uptake, while maintaining similar effectiveness compared to in-person procedures.

摘要

存款合同涉及参与者存入自己的资金,并根据行为改变获得回报。存款合同是经过实证支持的促进健康行为的治疗方法,但它们的采用率一直很低。我们比较了基于技术的和面对面的存款合同在促进 12 名参与者的身体活动方面的有效性和可接受性。参与者的日常步数使用 Fitbit 进行了 6 周的监测,并在研究结束时评估了治疗偏好。这两种治疗方法在增加身体活动方面同样有效,但大多数参与者更喜欢基于技术的存款合同。大多数参与者还报告说,他们的偏好与便利性有关。与面对面的程序相比,基于技术的实施可能是提高存款合同采用率的一种方法,同时保持类似的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验