Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam and The Faculty of Dentistry of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
General Dentist and Clinical Epidemiologist, Hoevelaken, The Netherlands.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2021 Feb;19(1):78-92. doi: 10.1111/idh.12463. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
To establish the effect of a single-brushing exercise on dental plaque removal using an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush (OR-PTB) as compared to a high-frequency sonic power toothbrush (HFS-PTB).
The MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL databases were searched up to September 2019. The inclusion criteria contained (randomized) controlled clinical trials involving healthy adult participants brushing with an OR-PTB as compared to an HFS-PTB. Plaque index (PI) scores were evaluated after a single-brushing exercise.
A total of 15 publications were included, representing 34 comparisons, of which 8 were professional brushing exercises and 26 participant brushing exercises. The potential risk of bias was estimated to be low. In the overall descriptive analysis of 34 comparisons, 19 comparisons showed a statistically significant difference in favour of the OR-PTB and 4 in favour of the HFS-PTB. The meta-analysis using the professional brushing study design showed a significant difference of means (DiffM) in favour of the OR-PTB (PI score) (DiffM 0.19; P < .0001) (95% CI [013; 0.25]). In those studies where the participants brushed themselves, the data were inconclusive. PI scores showed no difference between the two brushes (P = .15), while one plaque index (the Rustogi Modified Navy plaque index) indicated significant favour for the OR-PTB (DiffM 0.06; P = .002) (95% CI [0.02; 0.09]).
Based on the estimated evidence profile, there is moderate certainty of evidence of a very small but significant beneficial effect on plaque removal after a single-brushing exercise with the OR-PTB over the HFS-PTB.
与高频超声电动牙刷(HFS-PTB)相比,评估使用往复式电动牙刷(OR-PTB)单次刷牙对牙菌斑清除的效果。
检索 MEDLINE-PubMed 和 Cochrane-CENTRAL 数据库,截至 2019 年 9 月。纳入标准为:使用 OR-PTB 与 HFS-PTB 进行单次刷牙,涉及健康成年参与者的随机对照临床试验。评价单次刷牙后菌斑指数(PI)评分。
共纳入 15 项研究,涉及 34 项比较,其中 8 项为专业刷牙实验,26 项为参与者自我刷牙实验。估计偏倚风险为低。在 34 项比较的总体描述性分析中,19 项比较显示 OR-PTB 具有统计学意义的优势,4 项比较显示 HFS-PTB 具有统计学意义的优势。使用专业刷牙实验设计的荟萃分析显示,OR-PTB(PI 评分)的均值差异有统计学意义(DiffM 0.19;P<.0001)(95%CI [0.13;0.25])。在参与者自我刷牙的研究中,数据结果不一致。两种牙刷的 PI 评分无差异(P=.15),而一个菌斑指数(Rustogi 改良海军菌斑指数)显示 OR-PTB 具有显著优势(DiffM 0.06;P=.002)(95%CI [0.02;0.09])。
根据评估证据概况,有中等确定性证据表明,与 HFS-PTB 相比,OR-PTB 单次刷牙后牙菌斑清除效果有非常小但有统计学意义的改善。