Oral Care Research & Development, The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, Ohio, USA.
Oral Care Research & Development, The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, Ohio, USA.
Int Dent J. 2024 Feb;74(1):146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
Research continues to show an association between oral health and systemic health, further stressing the importance of effective daily plaque removal via toothbrushing to maintain periodontal health and overall well-being. This investigation was undertaken to compare the efficacy of oscillating-rotating, sonic, and manual toothbrushes in reducing gingivitis and plaque in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with up to 6 months' follow-up.
This meta-analysis was conducted from a single database (Procter & Gamble Oral Care Clinical Archive) including RCTs from 2007 to 2022. Three authors independently assessed study eligibility. Disagreements concerning selected studies were resolved by discussion with an expert colleague. Direct and indirect treatment comparisons along with transition rates to gingival health were calculated using participant-level data. Transition-to-health time was calculated using data from all time points. Subregion analyses evaluated number of bleeding sites and plaque reduction.
This meta-analysis included 21 gingivitis RCTs and 25 plaque RCTs. Relative to manual and sonic brushes, oscillating-rotating brushes had a higher percentage of participants who transitioned to gingival health (72% vs 21% and 54%; P < .001). Compared with manual and sonic brushes, respectively, oscillating-rotating brushes demonstrated greater bleeding site reductions (by 52% and 29%; P < .001) and superior plaque reductions (by 19% and 5%; P < .001). Oscillating-rotating brushes provided faster transitions to health than sonic brushes and showed greater efficacy across subregions. The most advanced oscillating-rotating brush demonstrated statistically significantly greater efficacy compared with traditional oscillating-rotating, manual, and sonic brushes when analysed separately. Risk of bias was deemed low for all studies.
Oscillating-rotating toothbrushes offer superior results for transition to health, gingivitis, and plaque reduction compared with manual and sonic brushes. The most advanced oscillating-rotating model offers enhanced efficacy vs traditional models.
研究继续表明口腔健康与全身健康之间存在关联,这进一步强调了通过刷牙有效去除日常牙菌斑以维持牙周健康和整体健康的重要性。本研究旨在比较在为期 6 个月的随访中,旋转振动牙刷、声波牙刷和手动牙刷在减少牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的功效。
本荟萃分析来自单一数据库(宝洁口腔护理临床档案),其中包括 2007 年至 2022 年的随机对照试验。三位作者独立评估了研究的入选资格。对于选定的研究,如果存在分歧,则通过与一位专家同事进行讨论来解决。使用参与者水平的数据计算直接和间接治疗比较以及向牙龈健康的转化率。使用所有时间点的数据计算达到健康状态的时间。亚区分析评估了出血点数量和菌斑减少情况。
本荟萃分析包括 21 项牙龈炎 RCT 和 25 项菌斑 RCT。与手动和声波牙刷相比,旋转振动牙刷使更多的参与者向牙龈健康状态转变(72%比 21%和 54%;P<.001)。与手动和声波牙刷相比,旋转振动牙刷的出血点减少(分别减少 52%和 29%;P<.001)和菌斑减少(分别减少 19%和 5%;P<.001)更为显著。与声波牙刷相比,旋转振动牙刷向健康状态的转变更快,并且在亚区显示出更好的疗效。最先进的旋转振动牙刷与传统的旋转振动、手动和声波牙刷相比,在单独分析时显示出统计学上更显著的疗效。所有研究的偏倚风险均被认为较低。
与手动和声波牙刷相比,旋转振动牙刷在向健康状态转变、牙龈炎和菌斑减少方面具有更好的效果。最先进的旋转振动模型与传统模型相比具有增强的功效。