Suppr超能文献

将计算机辅助血管抑制系统纳入 CT 图像中的肺结节检测:对常规临床环境下的敏感性和阅读时间的影响。

Incorporation of a computer-aided vessel-suppression system to detect lung nodules in CT images: effect on sensitivity and reading time in routine clinical settings.

机构信息

Konan Kosei Hospital, Takayacho-Omatsubara 137, Konan, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2021 Feb;39(2):159-164. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01043-y. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a computer-aided vessel-suppression system improves lung nodule detection in routine clinical settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used computer software that automatically suppresses pulmonary vessels on chest CT while preserving pulmonary nodules. Sixty-one chest CT images were included in our study. Three radiologists independently read either standard CT images alone or both computer-aided CT and standard CT images randomly to detect a pulmonary nodule ≥ 4 mm in diameter. After an interval of at least 15 days to avoid recall bias, the three radiologists interpreted the counterpart images of the same patients. The reference standard was decided by an expert panel. The primary endpoint was sensitivity. The secondary endpoint was interpretation time.

RESULTS

The average sensitivity improved with computer-aided CT (72% for standard CT vs. 84% for computer-aided CT, p = 0.02). There was no difference in the false-positive rate (21% for both standard CT and computer-aided CT, p = 0.98). Although the average reading time was 9.5% longer for computer-aided plus standard CT compared with standard CT alone, the difference was not significant (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Vessel-suppressed CT images helped radiologists to improve the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection without compromising the false-positive rate.

摘要

目的

评估计算机辅助血管抑制系统是否能提高常规临床环境下肺结节的检测率。

材料与方法

我们使用了一种计算机软件,它可以在 CT 扫描时自动抑制肺部血管,同时保留肺结节。我们的研究纳入了 61 例胸部 CT 图像。三位放射科医生分别独立地阅读标准 CT 图像或计算机辅助 CT 与标准 CT 图像的组合,以检测直径≥4mm 的肺结节。至少间隔 15 天后,避免回忆偏倚,三位放射科医生再对同一患者的对照图像进行解读。参考标准由专家小组决定。主要终点是敏感度。次要终点是解读时间。

结果

计算机辅助 CT 提高了平均敏感度(标准 CT 为 72%,计算机辅助 CT 为 84%,p=0.02)。假阳性率在标准 CT 和计算机辅助 CT 中没有差异(分别为 21%和 21%,p=0.98)。虽然计算机辅助 CT 与标准 CT 相比,平均阅读时间延长了 9.5%,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.11)。

结论

血管抑制 CT 图像有助于放射科医生提高肺结节检测的敏感度,而不影响假阳性率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验