Jordan DeVylder is with the Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, NY. Lisa Fedina is with the University of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor. Bruce Link is with the School of Public Policy and Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1704-1710. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305874. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Police violence has increasingly been recognized as a public health concern in the United States, and accumulating evidence has shown police violence exposure to be linked to a broad range of health and mental health outcomes. These associations appear to extend beyond the typical associations between violence and mental health, and to be independent of the effects of co-occurring forms of trauma and violence exposure. However, there is no existing theoretical framework within which we may understand the unique contributions of police violence to mental health and illness.This article aims to identify potential factors that may distinguish police violence from other forms of violence and trauma exposure, and to explore the possibility that this unique combination of factors distinguishes police violence from related risk exposures. We identify 8 factors that may alter this relationship, including those that increase the likelihood of overall exposure, increase the psychological impact of police violence, and impede the possibility of coping or recovery from such exposures.On the basis of these factors, we propose a theoretical framework for the further study of police violence from a public mental health perspective.
警察暴力在美国日益被视为公共卫生关注的问题,越来越多的证据表明,警察暴力暴露与广泛的健康和心理健康结果有关。这些关联似乎超出了暴力与心理健康之间的典型关联,并且独立于同时发生的创伤和暴力暴露的影响。然而,目前还没有一个理论框架可以让我们理解警察暴力对心理健康和疾病的独特贡献。本文旨在确定可能区分警察暴力与其他形式的暴力和创伤暴露的潜在因素,并探讨这种独特的综合因素是否可以将警察暴力与相关风险暴露区分开来。我们确定了 8 个可能改变这种关系的因素,包括那些增加总体暴露可能性、增加警察暴力心理影响以及阻碍应对或从这种暴露中恢复的可能性的因素。基于这些因素,我们从公共心理健康的角度提出了一个进一步研究警察暴力的理论框架。