Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Croydon University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):334-344. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004499. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
MRI assessment of rectal cancer not only assesses tumor depth and surgical resectability but also extramural disease which affects prognosis. We have observed that nonnodal tumor nodules (tumor deposits; mrTDs) have a distinct MRI appearance compared to lymph node metastases (mrLNMs).
We aimed to assess whether mrTDs and mrLNMs have different prognostic implications and compare these to other known prognostic markers.
This was a retrospective cohort study of 233 patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer from January 2007 to October 2015. Data were obtained from electronic records and MRIs blindly rereported. Survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic markers were evaluated using Cox regression and competing risks analysis. Inter-observer agreement for mrTD was measured using Cohen Kappa.
On multivariable analysis, baseline mrTD/mrEMVI (extramural venous invasion) status was the only significant MRI factor for adverse survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.36 (1.54-3.61] for overall survival, 2.37 (1.47-3.80) for disease-free survival (both P < 0.001), superseding T and N categories. mrLNMs were associated with good prognosis (HR 0.50 (0.31-0.80) P = 0.004 for overall survival, 0.60 (0.40-0.90) P = 0.014 for disease-free survival). On multivariable analysis, mrTDs/mrEMVI were strongly associated with distant recurrence (HR 6.53 (2.52-16.91) P ≤ 0.001) whereas T and N category were not. In a subgroup analysis of posttreatment MRIs in postchemoradiotherapy patients, mrTD/mrEMVI status was again the only significant prognostic factor; furthermore those who showed a good treatment response had a prognosis similar to patients who were negative at baseline. Inter-observer agreement for detection of mrTDs was k0.77 and k0.83.
Current MRI staging predicting T and N status does not adequately predict prognosis. Positive mrTD/mrEMVI status has greater prognostic accuracy and would be superior in determining treatment and follow-up protocols. Chemoradiotherapy may be a highly effective treatment strategy in mrTD/mrEMVI positive patients.
MRI 评估直肠癌不仅评估肿瘤深度和手术可切除性,还评估影响预后的外膜疾病。我们观察到非结节性肿瘤结节(肿瘤沉积;mrTDs)与淋巴结转移(mrLNMs)相比具有明显的 MRI 表现。
我们旨在评估 mrTDs 和 mrLNMs 是否具有不同的预后意义,并将其与其他已知的预后标志物进行比较。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2007 年 1 月至 2015 年 10 月期间接受直肠癌切除术的 233 例患者。数据来自电子病历和 MRI 盲法重新报告。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法确定生存情况。使用 Cox 回归和竞争风险分析评估预后标志物。使用 Cohen Kappa 评估 mrTD 的观察者间一致性。
多变量分析显示,基线 mrTD/mrEMVI(外膜静脉侵犯)状态是唯一显著影响生存的 MRI 因素[总生存的危险比(HR)为 2.36(1.54-3.61),疾病无进展生存的 HR 为 2.37(1.47-3.80)(均 P < 0.001),超过了 T 和 N 分期。mrLNMs 与良好的预后相关(总生存的 HR 为 0.50(0.31-0.80),P = 0.004,疾病无进展生存的 HR 为 0.60(0.40-0.90),P = 0.014)。多变量分析显示,mrTDs/mrEMVI 与远处复发密切相关(HR 为 6.53(2.52-16.91),P ≤ 0.001),而 T 和 N 分期则不是。在接受放化疗后的患者的治疗后 MRI 的亚组分析中,mrTD/mrEMVI 状态仍然是唯一具有显著预后意义的因素;此外,那些显示出良好治疗反应的患者的预后与基线时阴性的患者相似。检测 mrTDs 的观察者间一致性为 k0.77 和 k0.83。
目前预测 T 和 N 状态的 MRI 分期不能充分预测预后。阳性 mrTD/mrEMVI 状态具有更高的预后准确性,在确定治疗和随访方案方面更具优势。放化疗可能是 mrTD/mrEMVI 阳性患者的一种非常有效的治疗策略。