Creemers Davy M J, Iversen Henrik, Banken Evi, Piqeur Floor, Ketelaers Stijn H J, Daniëls-Gooszen Alette, Palmer Gabriella J, Holm Torbjörn, Rutten Harm, Suzuki Chikako, Burger Jacobus W A, Martling Anna, Nederend Joost
Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Department of GROW, School for Developmental Biology & Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jul;7(4):e240246. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240246.
Purpose To determine the influence of location, extent of tissue invasion, and tumor morphology at MRI on the resectability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and postresection oncologic outcomes of LRRC. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients diagnosed with LRRC who underwent surgery with curative intent at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven and Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm between January 2003 and December 2017. Two expert radiologists reviewed available MR images while adhering to a standardized reviewing checklist. The effect of pelvic structure involvement, tumor morphology on the primary outcome of resection margin status, and secondary outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results The final analysis included 328 patients with LRRC (mean age ± SD, 64.9 years ± 9.6; 126 female, 202 male). Resection margins were negative in 217 (66.2%) patients and positive in 111 patients (33.8%). Tumor size, tumor type, and border type on MR images were all associated with resectability. Central recurrences were associated with the lowest likelihood of positive resection margins (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.71; < .001), whereas lateral recurrences were associated with the highest likelihood (OR, 2.00; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.19: = .004). Similarly, central recurrences were associated with better disease-free survival compared with lateral recurrences (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.90; = .006 vs HR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.94; = .003, respectively). Similar findings were observed after correcting for resection margin status. Conclusion Standardized MRI assessment of tumor characteristics in patients with LRRC resulted in the identification of specific prognostic factors. Central compartment involvement and well-defined tumors were associated with improved prognosis, whereas lateral compartment involvement and fibrotic spiculated tumors were associated with a worse prognosis after surgical resection. Rectum, MR-Imaging, Abdomen/GI, Oncology, Surgery, Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Tumor Biology © RSNA, 2025.
目的 确定磁共振成像(MRI)显示的位置、组织侵犯范围和肿瘤形态对局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC)可切除性及LRRC切除术后肿瘤学结局的影响。材料与方法 这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2003年1月至2017年12月期间在埃因霍温卡特琳娜医院和斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院接受根治性手术的连续LRRC确诊患者。两名专家放射科医生按照标准化检查清单对可用的MR图像进行评估。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归以及Cox比例风险分析评估盆腔结构受累、肿瘤形态对切缘状态这一主要结局以及总生存和无病生存这些次要结局的影响。结果 最终分析纳入了328例LRRC患者(平均年龄±标准差,64.9岁±9.6岁;女性126例,男性202例)。217例(66.2%)患者切缘阴性,111例患者(33.8%)切缘阳性。MR图像上的肿瘤大小、肿瘤类型和边界类型均与可切除性相关。中央复发与切缘阳性可能性最低相关(比值比[OR],0.45;95%置信区间:0.28,0.71;P<0.001),而外侧复发与切缘阳性可能性最高相关(OR,2.00;95%置信区间:1.25,3.19;P = 0.004)。同样,与外侧复发相比,中央复发与更好的无病生存相关(风险比[HR],0.69;95%置信区间:0.53,0.90;P = 0.006 vs HR,1.49;95%置信区间:1.14,1.94;P = 0.003)。在校正切缘状态后观察到类似结果。结论 对LRRC患者进行标准化的MRI肿瘤特征评估可识别特定的预后因素。中央腔隙受累和边界清晰的肿瘤与预后改善相关,而外侧腔隙受累和纤维化毛刺状肿瘤与手术切除后预后较差相关。直肠,磁共振成像腹部/胃肠道,肿瘤学,外科学,局部复发性直肠癌,肿瘤生物学 ©RSNA,2025年