Suppr超能文献

设计和基线数据:一项比较两种方法扩大职业性日光防护干预的随机试验。

Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention.

机构信息

Research at Klein Buendel, Inc, A Health Communication and Media Development Firm, Golden, CO, USA.

President at Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;97:106147. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106147. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful methods for scaling-up evidence-based programs are needed to prevent skin cancer among adults who work outdoors in the sun.

METHODS

A randomized trial is being conducted comparing two methods of scaling-up the Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) intervention. Departments of transportation (DOTs) from 21 U.S. states are participating and their 138 regional districts were randomized following baseline assessment. In districts assigned to the in-person method (n = 46), project staff meets personally with managers, conducts trainings for employees, and provides printed materials. In districts assigned to the digital method (n = 92), project staff conduct these same activities virtually, using conferencing technology, online training, and electronic materials. Delivery of SSW in both groups was tailored to managers' readiness to adopt occupational sun safety. Posttesting will assess manager's support for and use of SSW and employees' sun safety. An economic evaluation will explore whether the method that uses digital technology results in lower implementation of SSW but is more cost-effective relative to the in-person method.

RESULTS

The state DOTs range in size from 997 to 18,415 employees. At baseline, 1113 managers (49.0%) completed the pretest (91.5% male, 91.1% white, 19.77 years on the job, 66.5% worked outdoors; and 24.4% had high-risk skin types). They were generally supportive of occupational sun safety. A minority reported that the employer had a written policy, half reported training, and two-thirds, messaging on sun protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital methods are available that may make scale-up of SSW cost-effective in a national distribution to nearly half of the state DOTs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT03278340.

摘要

背景

需要成功的方法来扩大循证项目,以预防在户外阳光下工作的成年人的皮肤癌。

方法

正在进行一项随机试验,比较两种扩大 Sun Safe Workplaces(SSW)干预措施的方法。来自 21 个美国州的交通部门参与了该试验,并且在基线评估后对其 138 个地区进行了随机分组。在分配给面对面方法的地区(n=46)中,项目工作人员亲自与管理人员会面,为员工提供培训,并提供印刷材料。在分配给数字方法的地区(n=92)中,项目工作人员使用会议技术、在线培训和电子材料来虚拟地开展这些相同的活动。在这两个组中,SSW 的提供都根据管理人员对采用职业性防晒的准备情况进行了调整。在测试后,将评估管理人员对 SSW 的支持和使用情况,以及员工的防晒情况。经济评估将探讨使用数字技术的方法是否会导致 SSW 的实施降低,但相对于面对面方法更具成本效益。

结果

州交通部门的规模从 997 名员工到 18415 名员工不等。在基线时,有 1113 名管理人员(49.0%为男性,91.1%为白人,在职年限为 19.77 年,66.5%在户外工作;24.4%有高危皮肤类型)完成了预测试(91.5%为男性,91.1%为白人,在职年限为 19.77 年,66.5%在户外工作;24.4%有高危皮肤类型)。他们普遍支持职业性防晒。少数人报告说雇主有书面政策,一半人报告有培训,三分之二的人有防晒信息。

结论

数字方法可用于将 SSW 有效推广到近一半的州交通部门,这可能使其具有成本效益。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号为 NCT03278340。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/7490282/5c3edff62f90/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验