Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0238833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238833. eCollection 2020.
Brief interventions based on personalized feedback have shown promising results in reducing risky alcohol use among university students. We investigated the effects of activating deliberative (predecisional) or implemental (postdecisional) mindsets on the effectiveness of a standardized brief intervention, the ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention. This intervention comprises a personalized feedback and a decisional balance exercise. We hypothesized that participants in a deliberative mindset should show better outcomes related to risk perception and behavior than participants in an implemental mindset.
A sample of 257 students provided baseline measures on risk perception, readiness to change, and alcohol use. Of those, 64 students with risky alcohol use were randomly allocated to one of two mindset induction conditions-deliberative or implemental mindset. Thereafter, they received the ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention and completed self-report questionnaires on changes in risk perception, alcohol use, and readiness to change at post-intervention and four-week follow-up.
In contrast to our hypotheses, the four-weeks follow-up revealed that participants in the implemental mindset consumed significantly less alcohol than participants in a deliberative mindset did. The former decreased and the latter increased their alcohol intake; resistance to the brief intervention was stronger in the latter condition. However, neither deliberative nor implemental mindset participants showed any changes in risk perceptions or in their readiness to change alcohol consumption.
These findings suggest that mindset induction is a powerful moderator of the effects of the ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention. We argue that systematic research on mindset effects on brief intervention techniques aimed to reduce risky alcohol use is highly needed in order to identify the processes involved with commitment and resistance being the main candidates.
基于个性化反馈的简短干预措施已显示出在减少大学生危险饮酒方面的良好效果。我们调查了激活决策前(深思熟虑)或决策后(执行)心态对标准化简短干预措施——ASSIST 关联简短干预的效果的影响。该干预措施包括个性化反馈和决策平衡练习。我们假设,在深思熟虑心态下的参与者应该在风险感知和行为方面表现出比在执行心态下的参与者更好的结果。
一个由 257 名学生组成的样本提供了风险感知、改变意愿和饮酒方面的基线测量。其中,64 名有危险饮酒行为的学生被随机分配到两种心态诱导条件之一——深思熟虑或执行心态。之后,他们接受了 ASSIST 关联简短干预,并在干预后和四周随访时完成了关于风险感知、饮酒和改变意愿变化的自我报告问卷。
与我们的假设相反,四周随访结果显示,执行心态的参与者饮酒量明显少于深思熟虑心态的参与者。前者减少了饮酒量,后者增加了饮酒量;后者对简短干预的抵制更强。然而,深思熟虑和执行心态的参与者在风险感知或改变饮酒意愿方面都没有任何变化。
这些发现表明,心态诱导是 ASSIST 关联简短干预效果的有力调节因素。我们认为,需要对针对减少危险饮酒的简短干预技术的心态效应进行系统研究,以确定涉及承诺和抵制的过程,这是主要的候选因素。