Suppr超能文献

[对23例难治性或复发性重型再生障碍性贫血患者进行免疫抑制再治疗]

[Retreatment with immunosuppression for 23 patients with refractory or relapsed severe aplastic anemia].

作者信息

Li J P, Peng G X, Ye L, Li Y, Yang W R, Li Y, Fan H H, Zhao X, Zhou K, Jing L P, Zhang L, Zhang F K

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 14;41(8):661-665. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.08.008.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secondary immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in refractory or relapsed severe aplastic anemia. The hematologic response and safety of 23 patients with refractory or relapsed SAA treated with secondary IST (including ATG/ALG + cyclosporine or HD-CTX) in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 23 patients were involved, including 11 males and 12 females, with a median age of 21 (11-62) years. In the refractory group, the interval of IST was 7 (6-12) months. In the relapsed group, on the other hand, the interval between two courses of IST was 39 (14-51) months. At 6 months after IST, the overall response rate was 69.5% (16/23) ; 60% (6/10) of the refractory group 77% (10/13) of the relapsed group; 64% (7/11) of the ATG/ALG group 75% (9/12) of the HD-CTX group. Among the patients who got the hematologic response, two patients relapsed again, all of them from the relapse group. After the third IST, they got the response again. The second IST is safe and effective for refractory and relapsed SAA patients; the early serologic reaction should be paid attention to when using the same ATG/ALG, and the risk can be reduced by changing the type of ATG/ALG or other IST programs. The third IST can still obtain the treatment response for the second relapse patients.

摘要

本研究旨在评估二线免疫抑制治疗(IST)在难治性或复发性重型再生障碍性贫血中的疗效和安全性。回顾性分析了我院23例接受二线IST(包括抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/抗淋巴细胞球蛋白+环孢素或大剂量环磷酰胺)治疗的难治性或复发性重型再生障碍性贫血患者的血液学反应及安全性。共纳入23例患者,其中男性11例,女性12例,中位年龄为21(11 - 62)岁。难治组中,IST间隔时间为7(6 - 12)个月。而复发性组中,两个疗程IST之间的间隔时间为39(14 - 51)个月。IST后6个月时,总缓解率为69.5%(16/23);难治组为60%(6/10),复发性组为77%(10/13);抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/抗淋巴细胞球蛋白组为64%(7/11),大剂量环磷酰胺组为75%(9/12)。在获得血液学缓解的患者中,有2例再次复发,均来自复发性组。第三次IST后,他们再次获得缓解。二线IST对难治性和复发性重型再生障碍性贫血患者安全有效;再次使用相同的抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/抗淋巴细胞球蛋白时应注意早期血清学反应,可通过更换抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/抗淋巴细胞球蛋白类型或其他IST方案降低风险。第三次IST对第二次复发的患者仍可获得治疗反应。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验