• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Objective analysis of postoperative air leaks can aid in decision-making, but does the use of digital drains really impact patient outcomes?

作者信息

Joshi Vijay, Dimarakis Ioannis

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2020 Aug;12(8):3927-3929. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.04.22.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2020.04.22
PMID:32944301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7475533/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Objective analysis of postoperative air leaks can aid in decision-making, but does the use of digital drains really impact patient outcomes?对术后漏气进行客观分析有助于决策制定，但使用数字引流管真的会影响患者的治疗结果吗？
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Aug;12(8):3927-3929. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.04.22.
2
A pilot study of a digital drainage system in pneumothorax.气胸数字化引流系统的初步研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2014 Nov 4;1(1):e000033. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000033. eCollection 2014.
3
[Application of Digital Drainage System in Postoperative Refractory Prolonged Air Leaks after Pulmonary Surgery].[数字引流系统在肺手术后难治性持续性漏气中的应用]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 20;20(12):833-836. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.12.07.
4
Bubbles-in-the-chamber vs digital screen in chest drainage: A blind analysis of compared postoperative air leaks evaluation.胸腔引流中气泡与数字屏幕的比较：术后气漏评估的盲法分析。
Heart Lung. 2021 Jan-Feb;50(1):226-230. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Implementation of a user-friendly protocol for interpretation of air-leaks and management of intercostal chest drains after thoracic surgery.实施一种便于用户使用的协议，用于解释胸外科手术后的气胸漏气情况并管理肋间胸腔引流管。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2003 Sep;2(3):251-5. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00054-9.
6
Low suction on digital drainage devices promptly improves post-operative air leaks following lung resection operations: a retrospective study.数字引流装置低负压吸引可迅速改善肺切除术后的漏气情况：一项回顾性研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01485-z.
7
Multicenter randomized study on the comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems.电子与传统胸腔引流系统比较的多中心随机研究。
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3811-8.
8
The utility of lumbar drains in modern endoscopic skull base surgery.腰大池引流管在现代内镜颅底手术中的应用
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;23(1):78-82. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000119.
9
Optimal management of postoperative parenchymal air leaks.术后实质性气胸的最佳管理
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov;10(Suppl 32):S3789-S3798. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.05.
10
Cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring after repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks.脑脊液漏修补术后的脑脊液压力监测
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Apr;130(4):443-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.018.

本文引用的文献

1
The benefits of digital drainage system versus traditional drainage system after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.机器人辅助肺叶切除术后数字引流系统与传统引流系统的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5328-5335. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.69.
2
Digital chest drainage system versus traditional chest drainage system after pulmonary resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肺切除术后数字式胸腔引流系统与传统胸腔引流系统的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0842-x.
3
The effects of low suction on digital drainage devices after lobectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial†.肺叶切除术后使用电视辅助胸腔镜手术的低吸力对数字引流装置影响的随机对照试验†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Apr 1;55(4):673-681. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy361.
4
Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).肺手术后加速康复外科指南：加速康复外科（ERAS®）协会和欧洲胸外科医师学会（ESTS）的建议。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):91-115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301.
5
How to get the best from robotic thoracic surgery.如何从机器人辅助胸外科手术中获得最佳效果。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 8):S947-S950. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.157.
6
Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis.数字式胸腔引流优于肺手术后传统胸腔引流：一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):635-643. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy141.
7
Effectiveness of Robotic Lobectomy-Outcome and Learning Curve in a High Volume Center.高容量中心机器人肺叶切除术的有效性——结果与学习曲线
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;67(7):573-577. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639477. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
From RATS to VATS: why we did choose this way.从大鼠实验到胸腔镜手术：我们为何选择这条路。
J Vis Surg. 2018 Jan 26;4:23. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.01.04. eCollection 2018.
9
Digital versus analogue pleural drainage phase 1: prospective evaluation of interobserver reliability in the assessment of pulmonary air leaks.数字式与模拟式胸腔引流 第1阶段：评估肺漏气时观察者间可靠性的前瞻性研究
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Oct;21(4):403-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv128. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lobectomy: Can a Robotic Approach Improve Short-Term Outcomes and Operative Safety?机器人辅助胸腔镜手术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于肺叶切除术的比较：机器人手术方式能否改善短期疗效和手术安全性？
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;64(4):354-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548733. Epub 2015 Apr 13.