• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

螺旋式:急诊科医学生非线性思维的一种方法。

SPIRALS: An Approach to Non-Linear Thinking for Medical Students in the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Small Rebecca N, Fleet Lisa, Whalen Desmond, Renouf Tia S

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.

Office of Professional Development, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Aug 13;12(8):e9727. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9727.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.9727
PMID:32944446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7489793/
Abstract

Context We lack guidelines to inform the necessary components of an emergency medicine undergraduate rotation. Traditionally, clinical reasoning has been taught using linear thought processes likely not ideal for diagnostic and management decisions made in the emergency department.  Methods We used the Delphi method to obtain consensus on a set of competencies for undergraduate emergency medicine that illustrate the non-linear concepts we believe are necessary for learners. Competencies were informed by a naturalistic observational study of emergency physicians. A survey outlining these competencies was subsequently circulated to emergency physicians who rated their relative importance. Results Eleven competencies were included in Round 1, all rated within the "for consideration" for inclusion range. This was reduced to 10 competencies in Round 2, which was only marginally more definitive with respondents rating one competency in the "definite inclusion range" and the remaining in the "for consideration" range.  Conclusions This study was conducted to address a gap in the current undergraduate emergency medicine curriculum. Consensus on the relative importance of each competency was not achieved, though we believe that the competencies that arose from this study will help medical students develop the non-linear thinking processes necessary to succeed in emergency medicine.

摘要

背景 我们缺乏指导本科急诊医学轮转必要组成部分的指南。传统上,临床推理一直是通过线性思维过程来教授的,而这种方式可能并不适用于急诊科做出的诊断和管理决策。方法 我们采用德尔菲法,就一组本科急诊医学能力达成共识,这些能力体现了我们认为学习者所必需的非线性概念。这些能力是通过对急诊医师的自然主义观察研究得出的。随后,一份概述这些能力的调查问卷被分发给急诊医师,让他们对其相对重要性进行评分。结果 第一轮纳入了11项能力,所有能力的评分都在“可供考虑”纳入的范围内。第二轮减少到10项能力,这只是稍微更具确定性一些,受访者将一项能力评为“肯定纳入”范围,其余的评为“可供考虑”范围。结论 开展这项研究是为了解决当前本科急诊医学课程中的一个空白。虽然我们没有就每项能力的相对重要性达成共识,但我们相信,这项研究中产生的能力将有助于医学生培养在急诊医学中取得成功所必需的非线性思维过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/5c9af1e4aa34/cureus-0012-00000009727-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/2c11f9847662/cureus-0012-00000009727-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/c3cca3d7fe61/cureus-0012-00000009727-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/5c9af1e4aa34/cureus-0012-00000009727-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/2c11f9847662/cureus-0012-00000009727-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/c3cca3d7fe61/cureus-0012-00000009727-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686d/7489793/5c9af1e4aa34/cureus-0012-00000009727-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
SPIRALS: An Approach to Non-Linear Thinking for Medical Students in the Emergency Department.螺旋式:急诊科医学生非线性思维的一种方法。
Cureus. 2020 Aug 13;12(8):e9727. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9727.
2
Undergraduate acute care clinical competencies for managing acute care cases in adult patients within a South African in-hospital environment: A modified Delphi Study.南非医院环境下成人患者急性护理病例管理的本科急性护理临床能力:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;14(3):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Administration and leadership competencies: establishment of a national consensus for emergency medicine.管理与领导能力:建立全国性的急诊医学共识。
CJEM. 2015 Mar;17(2):107-14. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.131270.
4
A Delphi consensus study for teaching "Basic Trauma Management" to third-year medical students.德尔菲共识研究:向医学三年级学生教授“基本创伤管理”。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 17;27(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0675-6.
5
Determining and prioritizing competencies in the undergraduate internal medicine curriculum in Saudi Arabia.确定和确定沙特阿拉伯本科内科医学课程的能力。
East Mediterr Health J. 2011 Aug;17(8):656-62.
6
Informatics in Undergraduate Medical Education: Analysis of Competency Frameworks and Practices Across North America.本科医学教育中的信息学:北美地区能力框架与实践分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Sep 13;8(3):e39794. doi: 10.2196/39794.
7
Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey.卫生专业人员循证实践的核心能力:基于系统评价和德尔菲调查的共识声明。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281.
8
Introduction of evidence-based medicine in undergraduate medical curriculum for development of professional competencies in medical students.将循证医学引入本科生医学课程,以培养医学生的专业能力。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Dec;25(6):719-23. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835a1112.
9
Developing a Competency-based Curriculum in Basic and Clinical Pharmacology--A Delphi Study among Physicians.制定基于能力的基础与临床药理学课程——一项针对医生的德尔菲研究
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015 Dec;117(6):413-20. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12436. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Core competencies for emergency medicine clerkships: results of a Canadian consensus initiative.急诊医学实习的核心能力:一项加拿大共识倡议的结果
CJEM. 2013 Jan;15(1):24-33.

本文引用的文献

1
Comfort with uncertainty: reframing our conceptions of how clinicians navigate complex clinical situations.对不确定性的舒适感:重新构建我们对临床医生如何应对复杂临床情况的概念。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):797-809. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9859-5. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
2
What trainees grapple with: a study of threshold concepts on the medicine ward.实习生所面临的问题:医学病房中阈概念的研究。
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):620-631. doi: 10.1111/medu.13526. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Putting the puzzle together: the role of 'problem definition' in complex clinical judgement.
拼凑拼图:“问题定义”在复杂临床判断中的作用。
Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):207-214. doi: 10.1111/medu.13210. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
4
What's in a Label? Is Diagnosis the Start or the End of Clinical Reasoning?标签里有什么?诊断是临床推理的起点还是终点?
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31(4):435-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3592-7. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
Emergency Physicians Think in Spirals.急诊医生的思维呈螺旋式。
Cureus. 2015 Nov 17;7(11):e381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.381.
6
Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning.阐明假设以增强我们对临床推理的理解和评估。
Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):442-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182851b5b.
7
Core competencies for emergency medicine clerkships: results of a Canadian consensus initiative.急诊医学实习的核心能力:一项加拿大共识倡议的结果
CJEM. 2013 Jan;15(1):24-33.
8
Assessing diagnostic reasoning: a consensus statement summarizing theory, practice, and future needs.评估诊断推理:总结理论、实践和未来需求的共识声明。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;19(12):1454-61. doi: 10.1111/acem.12034.
9
Situativity theory: a perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no. 52.情境理论:一种关于参与者和环境如何相互作用的视角:AMEE 指南第 52 号。
Med Teach. 2011;33(3):188-99. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550965.
10
Slowing down to stay out of trouble in the operating room: remaining attentive in automaticity.在手术室中慢下来以避免麻烦:保持在自动模式下的专注。
Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10):1571-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f073dd.