Section on Clinical, Behavioral and Outcomes Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ribeirao Preto College of Nursing, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center for Nursing Research Development, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Jan;26(1):e12309. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12309. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Child participation in type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-care is needed in developing countries due to a lack of resources, especially during the school day. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a therapeutic play intervention (ITP) versus standard education (SE) on the ability of children with T1D to correctly perform insulin injection technique.
Children with T1D (7-12 years) were recruited at two diabetes clinics in Brazil and randomized to ITP or SE. Registered nurses received protocol training to deliver the intervention and perform data collection. ITP group received an education that included a story about a child with T1D who self-injects insulin at school; SE group received routine clinic-based education. Preintervention, children were video-recorded giving insulin injections to a doll; postintervention, children were rerecorded giving the doll an injection. The research team reviewed the videos and assessed the injection technique using validated checklists. Parents reported children's self-injection practices at baseline and 30 days.
Children (N = 20, 40% male) were 9.6 ± 1.3 years old and had T1D for 3.6 ± 2.3 years; HbA1c was 9.1 ± 2.0%; 20% of ITP and 50% of SE children used syringes (vs. pens) for injections. At baseline, 80% of both groups knew how to self-inject; most were taught by a parent/relative. Injection technique scores were low in both groups; ITP group increased their scores significantly postintervention. Practices of self-injection did not change in either group after 30 days.
The play-based intervention appeared to improve the injection technique in the short-term. Pilot findings support the development of a larger trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ITP on educating children on insulin injections.
由于资源匮乏,尤其是在上学期间,发展中国家需要儿童参与 1 型糖尿病(T1D)的自我护理。本初步研究评估了治疗性游戏干预(ITP)与标准教育(SE)在 T1D 患儿正确执行胰岛素注射技术能力方面的差异。
在巴西的两家糖尿病诊所招募 T1D 患儿(7-12 岁),并将其随机分配至 ITP 或 SE 组。注册护士接受了协议培训,以实施干预并进行数据收集。ITP 组接受了包括一个关于在学校自我注射胰岛素的 T1D 患儿的故事的教育;SE 组接受了常规的诊所教育。在干预前,孩子们用玩偶进行胰岛素注射;干预后,孩子们重新给玩偶注射。研究小组查看视频,并使用经过验证的检查表评估注射技术。家长在基线和 30 天时报告孩子的自我注射实践情况。
共有 20 名儿童(40%为男性)参与研究,平均年龄为 9.6±1.3 岁,T1D 病程为 3.6±2.3 年;HbA1c 为 9.1±2.0%;20%的 ITP 组和 50%的 SE 组儿童使用注射器(而非笔)进行注射。在基线时,两组中均有 80%的儿童知道如何自我注射;大多数是由父母/亲属教授的。两组的注射技术评分均较低,干预后 ITP 组的评分显著提高。在干预后 30 天,两组的自我注射实践均无变化。
基于游戏的干预措施似乎在短期内提高了注射技术。初步研究结果支持开展更大规模的试验,以评估 ITP 在教育儿童胰岛素注射方面的有效性。