Suppr超能文献

下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉与局部浸润麻醉联合应用:一项随机对照试验

Combined inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia and local infiltration anaesthesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Li Zhicong, Yang Mi, Liao Ting, Zhou Yang, Yue Haiqiong, Piao Zhengguo, Zhou Libin

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2020 Sep 18. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2002-z.

Abstract

Aim To compare the anaesthetic effect of combination of inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia and local infiltration anaesthesia with nerve block anaesthesia techniques in the extraction of mandibular third molars.Materials and methods One hundred and fifty healthy adult volunteers were divided into three groups and were administered three different local anaesthetic techniques before tooth extractions: group A (inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve and buccal nerve block anaesthesia with lidocaine), group B (inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve and buccal nerve block anaesthesia with mepivacaine) and group C (inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia with lidocaine and infiltration anaesthesia with mepivacaine). The patients' reported pain on anaesthesia injection and tooth extraction, the surgeon's assessment of anaesthetic effect, the severity of intra-operative bleeding and post-operative complications were evaluated.Results There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale (VAS)-pain of anaesthesia among the three groups. Compared with groups A and B, group C had reduced VAS-pain of tooth extraction scores. Additionally, the surgeon's assessment of anaesthetic effect improved and intra-operative bleeding decreased.Conclusions The combination of inferior alveolar nerve block and infiltration anaesthesia provides a stronger anaesthetic effect in the extraction of mandibular third molars.

摘要

目的 比较下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉联合局部浸润麻醉与单纯神经阻滞麻醉技术在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中的麻醉效果。

材料与方法 将150名健康成年志愿者分为三组,在拔牙前分别采用三种不同的局部麻醉技术:A组(利多卡因行下牙槽神经、舌神经和颊神经阻滞麻醉),B组(甲哌卡因行下牙槽神经、舌神经和颊神经阻滞麻醉),C组(利多卡因行下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉,甲哌卡因行浸润麻醉)。评估患者对麻醉注射和拔牙时的疼痛报告、外科医生对麻醉效果的评估、术中出血严重程度及术后并发症情况。

结果 三组之间麻醉时视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛无显著差异。与A组和B组相比,C组拔牙时VAS疼痛评分降低。此外,外科医生对麻醉效果的评估改善,术中出血减少。

结论 下牙槽神经阻滞与浸润麻醉联合应用在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中提供更强的麻醉效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验