Department of Clinical Pharmacy Service, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Long Term Care, Hsin Sheng Junior College of Medical Care and Management, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Feb;46(1):128-133. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13265. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
The drug therapy of critically ill patients requires intensive evaluation and management due to their severity of illness. These patients often require complex medication regimens. This study analysed the pharmaceutical care provided by clinical pharmacists (CPs) in a single medical centre in Taiwan. In addition, we explored the drug-related problems (DRPs) experienced by patients in intensive care units (ICUs) to determine how to improve the quality and safety of drug therapy.
This retrospective study was conducted from February 2019 to January 2020. The CPs implemented Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) Scheme for Improving Hospital Drug Safety and Quality programme to improve the safety and quality of drug therapy. The CPs included in the study had at least 2 years' clinical experience and had participated in an ICU team for at least 6 consecutive months. They provided individualized drug treatment evaluation and intervention. Content of care was documented in the Clinical Pharmacy Service Record.
A total of 4374 pharmacy care records were evaluated by 12 CPs. The major category of ICU pharmaceutical care was medication reconciliation (n = 2938; 67.2%). Most of the medication interventions were for errors in dosing or dosing frequency (n = 218; 55.8%). Patients with renal dysfunction required more pharmaceutical interventions than did patients with normal renal function (odds ratio = 1.63; 95% confidence interval 1.31-2.01). The main interventions were related to antimicrobial agents (n = 386; 81.3%). During the study period, 99.2% of interventions were accepted and 90.8% were changed within 24 hours.
Increased pharmaceutical interventions for patients with renal dysfunction compared with patients with normal renal function were observed. Most cases of inappropriate frequency of dosing or dosing of antimicrobial agents required intervention.
由于病情严重,危重症患者的药物治疗需要进行强化评估和管理。这些患者通常需要复杂的药物治疗方案。本研究分析了在台湾的一家医疗中心中临床药师(CPs)提供的药物治疗管理服务。此外,我们还探讨了重症监护病房(ICUs)患者的药物相关问题(DRPs),以确定如何提高药物治疗的质量和安全性。
本回顾性研究于 2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 1 月进行。CPs 实施了台湾国家健康保险(NHI)计划,以改善医院药物安全和质量,以提高药物治疗的安全性和质量。参与研究的 CPs 至少具有 2 年的临床经验,并至少连续 6 个月参加 ICU 团队。他们提供个体化的药物治疗评估和干预。护理内容记录在临床药学服务记录中。
共有 12 名 CPs 评估了 4374 份药学护理记录。ICU 药物治疗的主要类别是药物重整(n=2938;67.2%)。大多数药物干预是针对剂量或剂量频率的错误(n=218;55.8%)。肾功能不全患者比肾功能正常患者需要更多的药物干预(比值比=1.63;95%置信区间 1.31-2.01)。主要干预措施与抗菌药物有关(n=386;81.3%)。在研究期间,99.2%的干预措施被接受,90.8%的干预措施在 24 小时内得到改变。
与肾功能正常患者相比,肾功能不全患者的药物干预措施增加。需要干预的大多数不适当的剂量或抗菌药物剂量频率的情况。