Suppr超能文献

对于局部晚期或边界可切除的胰腺癌患者,接受 FOLFIRINOX 或吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇新辅助治疗的老年患者是可行的,并且与非老年患者相比,其肿瘤学结局相似-RESPECT 研究的结果。

Neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients receiving FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is feasible and lead to a similar oncological outcome compared to non-aged patients - Results of the RESPECT-Study.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Departments of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:285-297. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The number of people aged 60 and above will rise from 46 million in 2015 to 157 in 2050 million, exceeding 30% of the population in many western countries. Consequently, the demand for oncological therapy for elderly patients will increase within the next decades. Currently, sufficient data on neoadjuvant therapy (NTx) of pancreatic cancer in elderly patients are lacking.

METHODS

Data of a multinational, retrospective database were screened for patients having received preoperative FOLFIRINOX (FFx) or Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GNP) for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC/BRPC) before June 2017. Data were included in an intention-to-treat-analysis and outcomes were compared between non-aged and elderly patients using a cut-off age of 63 (comparison 1) and 70 years (comparison 2).

RESULTS

Of 165 patients receiving NTx, 76 and 33 were older than 63 and 70 years. Baseline characteristics revealed that elderly patients preferably undergo GNP (comparison 1: p = 0.063; comparison2: p = 0.005), with less cycles of NTx (comparison 1: p = 0.057). Whereas reductions of NTx dosage was more common in elderly patients in comparison 1 (p = 0.003), resection rates (p = 0.575; p = 1.000) and median survival (p = 0.406; p = 0.499) were not different. Whereas resected patients showed no differences in survival (p = 0.328; p = 0.132), patients aged >70 years showed a decreased progression-free survival (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients treated with NTx show encouragingly high resection rates. If comorbidities allow for FFx or GNP, elderly patients with LAPC/BRPC can offered NTx with the prospect of survival comparable to younger patients.

摘要

简介

60 岁及以上人口数量将从 2015 年的 4600 万增加到 2050 年的 1.57 亿,超过许多西方国家的 30%。因此,未来几十年对老年患者肿瘤治疗的需求将会增加。目前,老年患者接受新辅助治疗(NTx)的相关数据还很缺乏。

方法

从一个多国家、回顾性数据库中筛选出 2017 年 6 月前接受过术前 FOLFIRINOX(FFx)或吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇(GNP)治疗局部晚期和边缘可切除胰腺癌(LAPC/BRPC)的患者数据。数据进行意向治疗分析,并使用 63 岁(比较 1)和 70 岁(比较 2)的年龄截止值比较非老年和老年患者的结果。

结果

165 名接受 NTx 的患者中,76 名和 33 名年龄大于 63 岁和 70 岁。基线特征显示,老年患者更倾向于接受 GNP(比较 1:p=0.063;比较 2:p=0.005),接受的 NTx 周期较少(比较 1:p=0.057)。然而,在比较 1 中,老年患者 NTx 剂量减少更为常见(p=0.003),但切除率(p=0.575;p=1.000)和中位生存期(p=0.406;p=0.499)无差异。接受手术的患者在生存方面没有差异(p=0.328;p=0.132),但年龄大于 70 岁的患者无进展生存期缩短(p=0.019)。

结论

接受 NTx 治疗的老年患者切除率较高。如果合并症允许使用 FFx 或 GNP,LAPC/BRPC 的老年患者可以接受 NTx,预期生存情况与年轻患者相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验