The University of Queensland, Australia.
The University of Southern Queensland, Australia.
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Dec;123:101346. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101346. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Current thinking about human memory is dominated by distinctions between episodic and semantic memory and between short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM). However, many memory phenomena seem to cut across these distinctions. This article attempts to set the groundwork for the issues that need to be resolved in generating an integrated model of long-term memory that incorporates semantic, episodic, and short-term memory. We contrast Nairne's (2002, Annual Review of Psychology) consensus account of short-term memory with a relatively generic theory of an integrated episodic-semantic memory. The later consists primarily of a list of principles which we and others argue are necessary to include in any theory of long-term memory. We then add some more specific assumptions to outline a modern theory of forgetting. We then turn to the issue of much of the phenomena thought to necessitate a dedicated short-term memory can be explained by an integrated theory of episodic and semantic memory. Our conclusion is that an integrated theory of long-term memory must be augmented to explain a small number of outstanding memory phenomena. Finally, we ask whether the augmentation needs to involve a dedicated mnemonic system, or sensory or language-based systems, which also have mnemonic capabilities.
目前关于人类记忆的思考主要集中在情节记忆和语义记忆、短期记忆(STM)和长期记忆(LTM)之间的区别上。然而,许多记忆现象似乎跨越了这些区别。本文试图为生成一个整合的长期记忆模型奠定基础,该模型将包括语义、情节和短期记忆。我们将奈尔(2002 年,《心理学年度评论》)关于短期记忆的共识观点与一个相对通用的整合情节-语义记忆理论进行了对比。后者主要由一系列原则组成,我们和其他人认为这些原则是任何长期记忆理论都必须包括的。然后,我们添加了一些更具体的假设来概述现代遗忘理论。然后,我们转向认为需要专门的短期记忆来解释的许多现象的问题。我们的结论是,必须扩展整合的长期记忆理论来解释少数突出的记忆现象。最后,我们询问是否需要增加一个专门的记忆系统,或者基于感觉或语言的系统,这些系统也具有记忆能力。