Birba Agustina, Vitale Francesca, Padrón Iván, Dottori Martín, de Vega Manuel, Zimerman Máximo, Sedeño Lucas, Ibáñez Agustín, García Adolfo M
Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Instituto Universitario de Neurociencia (IUNE), Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Cortex. 2020 Nov;132:460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
Non-invasive stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) modulates processing of decontextualized action words and sentences (i.e., verbal units denoting bodily motion). This suggests that language comprehension hinges on brain circuits mediating the bodily experiences evoked by verbal material. Yet, despite its relevance to constrain mechanistic language models, such a finding fails to reveal whether and how relevant circuits operate in the face of full-blown, everyday texts. Using a novel naturalistic discourse paradigm, we examined whether direct modulation of M1 excitability influences the grasping of narrated actions. Following random group assignment, participants received anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left M1, or sham stimulation of the same area, or anodal stimulation of the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Immediately afterwards, they listened to action-laden and neutral stories and answered questions on information realized by verbs (denoting action and non-action processes) and circumstances (conveying locative or temporal details). Anodal stimulation of the left M1 selectively decreased outcomes on action-relative to non-action information -a pattern that discriminated between stimulated and sham participants with 74% accuracy. This result was particular to M1 and held irrespective of the subjects' working memory and vocabulary skills, further attesting to its specificity. Our findings suggest that offline modulation of motor-network excitability might lead to transient unavailability of putative resources needed to evoke actions in naturalistic texts, opening promising avenues for the language embodiment framework.
对初级运动皮层(M1)进行非侵入性刺激可调节去情境化动作词和句子(即表示身体运动的语言单位)的处理。这表明语言理解取决于介导言语材料所唤起身体体验的脑回路。然而,尽管这一发现与约束机械语言模型相关,但它未能揭示相关回路在面对完整的日常文本时是否以及如何运作。我们使用一种新颖的自然话语范式,研究了M1兴奋性的直接调节是否会影响对叙述动作的理解。在随机分组后,参与者接受左侧M1的阳极经颅直流电刺激,或对同一区域的假刺激,或左侧腹外侧前额叶皮层的阳极刺激。之后,他们听取了充满动作和中性的故事,并回答了关于动词(表示动作和非动作过程)和情境(传达位置或时间细节)所实现信息的问题。左侧M1的阳极刺激相对于非动作信息选择性地降低了动作相关的结果——这种模式以74%的准确率区分了受刺激和假刺激的参与者。这一结果是M1特有的,且与受试者的工作记忆和词汇技能无关,进一步证明了其特异性。我们的研究结果表明,运动网络兴奋性的离线调节可能会导致在自然文本中唤起动作所需的假定资源暂时不可用,为语言具身框架开辟了有前景的途径。