Bioanalytics Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York, School of Public Health and Health Professions, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Buffalo, NY, USA.
J Safety Res. 2020 Sep;74:207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Injuries at work may negatively influence mental health due to lost or reduced working hours and financial burden of treatment. Our objective was to investigate, in U.S. workers (a) the prevalence of serious psychological distress (SPD) by injury status (occupational, non-occupational, and no injury) and injury characteristics, and (b) the association between injury status and SPD.
Self-reported injuries within the previous three months were collected annually for 225,331 U.S. workers in the National Health Interview Survey (2004-2016). Psychological distress during the past 30 days was assessed using the Kessler 6 (K6) questions with Likert-type scale (0-4, total score range: 0-24). SPD was defined as K6 ≥ 13. Prevalence ratios (PR) from fitted logistic regression models were used to assess relationships between injury and SPD after controlling for covariates.
The prevalence of SPD was 4.74%, 3.58%, and 1.56% in workers reporting occupational injury (OI), non-occupational injury (NOI), and no injury, respectively. Workers with head and neck injury had the highest prevalence of SPD (Prevalence: OI = 7.71%, NOI = 6.17%), followed by workers with scrape/bruise/burn/bite (6.32% for those with OI). Workers reporting OI were two times more likely to have SPD compared to those without injury (PR = 2.19, 95%CI: 1.62-2.96). However, there was no significant difference in SPD between workers with OI and workers with NOI (PR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.65-1.48).
The prevalence of SPD varied by injury status with the highest being among workers reporting OI. We found that the workers reporting OI were significantly more likely to have SPD than those without injury, but not more than those with NOI. Practical Applications: Mental health management programs by employers are necessary for workers who are injured in the workplace.
工作相关伤害可能会因工作时间减少或丧失以及治疗费用的经济负担而对心理健康产生负面影响。我们的目的是调查美国工人中:(a)按受伤状况(职业性、非职业性和无受伤)和受伤特征,受伤与严重心理困扰(SPD)的关系;(b)受伤状况与 SPD 之间的关系。
在全国健康访谈调查(2004-2016 年)中,每年收集 225331 名美国工人过去三个月内的自报告伤害情况。在过去 30 天内使用 Kessler 6(K6)问题和李克特量表(0-4,总分范围:0-24)评估心理困扰。将 K6≥13 定义为 SPD。在控制协变量后,使用拟合的逻辑回归模型计算比值比(PR)来评估伤害与 SPD 之间的关系。
报告职业性损伤(OI)、非职业性损伤(NOI)和无损伤的工人 SPD 的患病率分别为 4.74%、3.58%和 1.56%。头部和颈部受伤的工人 SPD 患病率最高(OI:7.71%,NOI:6.17%),其次是擦伤/瘀伤/烧伤/咬伤(OI 患者为 6.32%)。与无损伤的工人相比,报告 OI 的工人患 SPD 的可能性高两倍(PR=2.19,95%CI:1.62-2.96)。然而,OI 工人和 NOI 工人之间 SPD 无显著差异(PR=0.98,95%CI:0.65-1.48)。
SPI 的患病率因损伤状况而异,报告 OI 的工人患病率最高。我们发现,与无损伤的工人相比,报告 OI 的工人患 SPD 的可能性显著更高,但与 NOI 工人相比则不然。
雇主需要为在工作场所受伤的工人提供心理健康管理计划。