Suppr超能文献

执行性注意对失语症患者句子加工的影响。

Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia.

作者信息

Peristeri Eleni, Tsimpli Ianthi Maria, Dardiotis Efthimios, Tsapkini Kyrana

机构信息

University of Thessaly, Greece.

University of Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2020;34(8):943-969. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1622647. Epub 2019 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the recent years there has been increasing interest in the effects of attentional control on syntactic comprehension, as measured in garden path sentence resolution. Persons with aphasia (PWA) experience greater penalties in garden path sentences compared to language-unimpaired adults but the origin of this deficit remains a controversial issue. One of the possible deficits has been claimed to be disambiguation of lexical cues in the sentence. However, in languages such as English with little morphological variation this connection is hard to establish. To test this hypothesis we used garden path sentences in a morphologically rich language, Greek, where morphological cues may resolve garden path at the lexical level. We further tested whether domain-general attentional control abilities and in particular shifts in attentional control predict garden path resolution in PWA and age- and education-matched controls.

AIM

This study aimed to determine whether PWA were able to integrate disambiguating morphological (Case) cues while processing garden path sentences. In addition, we tested whether domain-general attentional control and in particular attentional shift from global to local and local to global information (as defined by Navon, 1977) correlates directly with garden path resolution in PWA and healthy controls.

METHODS & PROCEDURE: Fifteen participants with non-fluent/agrammatic aphasia along with fifteen age- and education-matched language-unimpaired adults performed an online self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task that included object/subject ambiguous sentences. Syntactic ambiguity was created by the optional transitivity of verbs, while the garden path effect was resolved by morphological Case. The individuals' executive attention skills were tested through an online non-verbal global-local attention shifting task that measured costs stemming from shifting attention from the global to the local level, and vice versa.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: PWA were slower and more erroneous than controls in integrating Case cues to disambiguate garden path sentences as manifested in the self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task. In the global local task, PWA exhibited greater global-to-local (vs. local-to-global) attention shifting costs, while controls did not exhibit dissociation. In the regression analysis, garden path resolution in PWA was significantly predicted by global-to-local attention shifting costs, while controls' garden path resolution was significantly predicted by local-to-global attention shift costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed for the first time that morphological cues can shed light in sentence comprehension deficits exhibited by PWA. Furthermore, domain-general attentional control abilities were significantly associated with sentence comprehension abilities in both healthy controls and PWA.

摘要

背景

近年来,人们越来越关注注意力控制对句法理解的影响,这是通过花园小径句子解析来衡量的。与语言未受损的成年人相比,失语症患者(PWA)在花园小径句子中受到的惩罚更大,但这种缺陷的根源仍然是一个有争议的问题。一种可能的缺陷被认为是句子中词汇线索的歧义消除。然而,在像英语这样形态变化较少的语言中,很难建立这种联系。为了验证这一假设,我们使用了形态丰富的语言希腊语中的花园小径句子,其中形态线索可能在词汇层面解决花园小径问题。我们进一步测试了一般领域的注意力控制能力,特别是注意力控制的转移,是否能预测PWA以及年龄和教育程度匹配的对照组中的花园小径解析。

目的

本研究旨在确定PWA在处理花园小径句子时是否能够整合消除歧义的形态(格)线索。此外,我们测试了一般领域的注意力控制,特别是从全局到局部和从局部到全局信息的注意力转移(如Navon在1977年所定义)是否与PWA和健康对照组中的花园小径解析直接相关。

方法与过程

15名非流利/语法缺失性失语症患者以及15名年龄和教育程度匹配的语言未受损成年人进行了一项在线自定进度阅读和语法判断任务,其中包括宾语/主语歧义句。句法歧义是由动词的可选及物性造成的,而花园小径效应则通过形态格来解决。通过一项在线非语言全局-局部注意力转移任务测试个体的执行注意力技能,该任务测量了从全局到局部以及从局部到全局转移注意力所产生的代价。

结果与结论

在自定进度阅读和语法判断任务中,PWA在整合格线索以消除花园小径句子歧义方面比对照组更慢且错误更多。在全局-局部任务中,PWA表现出更大的从全局到局部(相对于从局部到全局)的注意力转移代价,而对照组没有表现出差异。在回归分析中,PWA中的花园小径解析显著地由从全局到局部的注意力转移代价预测,而对照组的花园小径解析则显著地由从局部到全局的注意力转移代价预测。

结论

本研究首次表明形态线索可以揭示PWA所表现出的句子理解缺陷。此外,一般领域的注意力控制能力在健康对照组和PWA中均与句子理解能力显著相关。

相似文献

1
Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2020;34(8):943-969. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1622647. Epub 2019 May 31.
2
The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:171-194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
Assessing Syntactic Deficits in Chinese Broca's aphasia using the -Chinese (NAVS-C).
Aphasiology. 2016;30(7):815-840. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1111995. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
Structural priming from production to comprehension in aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2024;38(1):70-91. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2159314. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
7
The comprehension of sentences with unaccusative verbs in aphasia: a test of the intervener hypothesis.
Aphasiology. 2017;31(1):67-81. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1154499. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
8
Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep;57(5):990-1005. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12734. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2015;32(5):243-65. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2015.1057558. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
Priming sentence comprehension in aphasia: Effects of lexically independent and specific structural priming.
Aphasiology. 2019;33(7):780-802. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1581916. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Executive functions and language processing in persons with aphasia.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 28;14:1183870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183870. eCollection 2023.
2
Distinct Contributions of Working Memory and Attentional Control to Sentence Comprehension in Noise in Persons With Stroke.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Aug 9;64(8):3230-3241. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00694. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrophysiology of prosodic and lexical-semantic processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Dec;107:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
2
The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:171-194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
The use of standardised short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: a systematic review.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018 Apr;28(3):309-351. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1174718. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2015;32(5):243-65. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2015.1057558. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
5
A comparison of the BAT and BDAE-SF batteries in determining the linguistic ability in Greek-speaking patients with Broca's aphasia.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):464-79. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.560991. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
9
Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia.
Semin Speech Lang. 2008 Aug;29(3):169-87; quiz C 3-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082882.
10
Treating attention in mild aphasia: evaluation of attention process training-II.
J Commun Disord. 2006 Jan-Feb;39(1):37-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.06.001. Epub 2005 Jul 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验