Horswill Emily, Martin John, Guy J Adam
Sustainable Earth Institute, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
Department of Architecture, School of Art, Design and Architecture, Room 402, Roland Levinsky Building, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
Ecol Indic. 2020 Dec;119:106806. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106806. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Protected landscape status is one of the highest designations afforded by the British legislature. To maintain consistent landscape quality, track environmental interventions, or measure the impacts of planned and unexpected events there is a need for co-ordinated national as well as local environmental monitoring. Conventionally indicators are used as monitoring proxies for tracking complex changes in landscape form and qualities, designation criteria, compliance against protective legislation, and the effectiveness of varying governance programmes. The regulatory agency of UK (English) environmental standards on behalf of the government, Natural England, monitors against a framework of indicators for the designation criteria of 'natural beauty' in 10 UK National Parks (NP) and 33 Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), and distributes data and analysis annually. This paper centres on an empirical case study that investigates environmental indicators used on-the-ground, as evidenced in AONB management plans. These bottom-up indicators are compared with top-down indicator frameworks from both Natural England's monitoring programme (FMEOPL), and the emerging indicators associated with the UK 25-Year Plan to Improve the Environment (25YEP). A methodology is developed to collate diverse indicators from these three policy and governance sources and to recommend a synthetic list of 158 indicators with future potential as candidates of a national framework for monitoring environmental change in the UK at landscape-scale. Given the trans-national action of environmental stressors, this work is also considered to represent internationally significant findings.
受保护景观地位是英国立法机构赋予的最高指定之一。为了保持景观质量的一致性、跟踪环境干预措施或衡量计划内和意外事件的影响,需要进行全国范围以及地方层面的协调环境监测。传统上,指标被用作监测代理,以跟踪景观形态和质量的复杂变化、指定标准、遵守保护立法的情况以及不同治理计划的有效性。代表英国政府负责环境标准的监管机构——自然英格兰,依据一套指标框架,对英国10个国家公园(NP)和33个杰出自然美景区(AONB)的“自然美”指定标准进行监测,并每年发布数据和分析报告。本文围绕一个实证案例研究展开,该研究调查了AONB管理计划中所体现的实地使用的环境指标。将这些自下而上的指标与自然英格兰监测计划(FMEOPL)的自上而下的指标框架以及与英国《改善环境25年计划》(25YEP)相关的新兴指标进行了比较。开发了一种方法,用于整理来自这三个政策和治理来源的各种指标,并推荐一份包含158个指标的综合清单,这些指标在未来有可能成为英国景观尺度环境变化监测国家框架的候选指标。鉴于环境压力源的跨国作用,这项工作也被认为具有国际意义的研究结果。