Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202, U.S.A.
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2019 Dec;33(6):1275-1285. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13365. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Protected areas (PAs) are expected to conserve nature and provide ecosystem services in perpetuity, yet widespread protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) may compromise these objectives. Even iconic protected areas are vulnerable to PADDD, although these PADDD events are often unrecognized. We identified 23 enacted and proposed PADDD events within World Natural Heritage Sites and examined the history, context, and consequences of PADDD events in 4 iconic PAs (Yosemite National Park, Arabian Oryx Sanctuary, Yasuní National Park, and Virunga National Park). Based on insights from published research and international workshops, these 4 cases revealed the diverse pressures brought on by competing interests to develop or exploit natural landscapes and the variety of mechanisms that enables PADDD. Knowledge gaps exist in understanding of the conditions through which development pressures translate to PADDD events and their impacts, partially due to a lack of comprehensive PADDD records. Future research priorities should include comprehensive regional and country-level profiles and analysis of risks, impacts, and contextual factors related to PADDD. Policy options to better govern PADDD include improving tracking and reporting of PADDD events, establishing transparent PADDD policy processes, coordinating among legal frameworks, and mitigating negative impacts of PADDD. To support PADDD research and policy reforms, enhanced human and financial capacities are needed to train local researchers and to host publicly accessible data. As the conservation community considers the achievements of Aichi Target 11 and moves toward new biodiversity targets beyond 2020, researchers, practitioners, and policy makers need to work together to better track, assess, and govern PADDD globally.
保护区(PAs)预计将永久保护自然并提供生态系统服务,但广泛的保护区降级、缩小和除名(PADDD)可能会损害这些目标。即使是标志性的保护区也容易受到 PADDD 的影响,尽管这些 PADDD 事件通常未被识别。我们在世界自然遗产地内确定了 23 个已实施和拟议的 PADDD 事件,并研究了 4 个标志性保护区(约塞米蒂国家公园、阿拉伯大羚羊保护区、亚苏尼国家公园和维龙加国家公园)的 PADDD 事件的历史、背景和后果。根据已发表的研究和国际研讨会的见解,这 4 个案例揭示了因开发或利用自然景观而产生的各种竞争利益的压力,以及使 PADDD 成为可能的各种机制。由于缺乏全面的 PADDD 记录,对理解发展压力转化为 PADDD 事件及其影响的条件存在知识差距。未来的研究重点应包括对与 PADDD 相关的风险、影响和背景因素进行全面的区域和国家一级的概况和分析。更好地管理 PADDD 的政策选择包括改进 PADDD 事件的跟踪和报告、建立透明的 PADDD 政策流程、协调法律框架以及减轻 PADDD 的负面影响。为了支持 PADDD 研究和政策改革,需要加强人力和财力,培训当地研究人员并托管公开可访问的数据。随着保护界考虑实现爱知目标 11 的成就并朝着 2020 年后的新生物多样性目标前进,研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者需要共同努力,以更好地在全球范围内跟踪、评估和管理 PADDD。