Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄米亚米赞-泰皮大学医院罗布森分类2组和4组剖宫产的使用情况。

Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia.

作者信息

Harrison Margo S, Liyew Tewodros, Kirub Ephrem, Teshome Biruk, Jimenez-Zambrano Andrea, Muldrow Margaret, Yarinbab Teklemariam

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Aman, Bench Maji Zone, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Sep 4;2020:5620987. doi: 10.1155/2020/5620987. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this analysis was to determine what risk factors were associated with cesarean birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4.

METHODS

This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1,000 women who delivered at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital in the summer and fall of 2019.

RESULTS

Women in Robson Groups 2 and 4 comprised 11.4% ( = 113) of the total population ( = 993). The cesarean birth rate in Robson Group 2 ( = 56) was 37.5% and in Robson Group 4 ( = 57) was 24.6%. In Robson Group 2, of all prelabor cesareans ( = 5), one birth was elective cesarean by maternal request; the intrapartum cesarean births ( = 16) mostly had a maternal or fetal indication (93.8%), with one birth (6.2%) indicated by "failed induction or augmentation," which was a combined indication. In Robson Group 4, all 4 women delivered by prelabor cesarean had a maternal indication (one was missing data), and 3 of the intrapartum cesareans were indicated by "failed induction or augmentation." In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 2, having a labor duration of "not applicable" increased the risk of cesarean delivery (RR 2.9, CI (1.5, 5.4)). The odds of requiring maternal antibiotics was the only notable outcome with increased risk (RR 11.1, CI (1.9, 64.9)). In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 4, having a labor longer than 24 hours trended towards a significant association with cesarean (RR 3.6, CI (0.9, 14.3)), and women had a more dilated cervix on admission trended toward having a lower odds of cesarean (RR 0.8, CI (0.6, 1.0)).

CONCLUSION

Though rates of primary cesarean birth among women who have a term, single, cephalic fetus and are induced, augmented, or undergone prelabor cesarean birth are high, those that occur intrapartum seem to be associated with appropriate risk factors and indications, though we cannot say this definitely as we did not perform an audit. More research is needed on the prelabor subgroup as a separate entity.

摘要

背景

在我们的研究队列中,对于单胎、头位、足月胎儿的初产妇(第2组)或经产妇(第4组),如果进行引产、催产或临产前剖宫产,其初次剖宫产率较高。

目的

本分析的目的是确定第2组和第4组罗布森分类中与剖宫产相关的风险因素。

方法

本研究是一项基于医院的前瞻性横断面分析,对2019年夏秋两季在米赞-泰皮大学教学医院分娩的1000名妇女的便利样本进行研究。

结果

第2组和第4组的妇女占总人口的11.4%(n = 113)(N = 993)。第2组(n = 56)的剖宫产率为37.5%,第4组(n = 57)的剖宫产率为24.6%。在第2组中,所有临产前剖宫产(n = 5)中有1例是应产妇要求的选择性剖宫产;产时剖宫产(n = 16)大多有母体或胎儿指征(93.8%),1例(6.2%)指征为“引产或催产失败”,这是一个综合指征。在第4组中,所有4例临产前剖宫产的产妇都有母体指征(1例缺失数据),产时剖宫产中有3例指征为“引产或催产失败”。在第2组的多变量模型中,产程为“不适用”会增加剖宫产的风险(RR 2.9,CI(1.5,5.4))。需要使用母体抗生素是唯一风险增加的显著结果(RR 11.1,CI(1.9,64.9))。在第4组的多变量模型中,产程超过24小时与剖宫产有显著关联的趋势(RR 3.6,CI(0.9,14.3)),入院时宫颈扩张程度较大的妇女剖宫产几率有降低的趋势(RR 0.8,CI(0.6,1.0))。

结论

尽管对于单胎、头位、足月胎儿且进行引产、催产或临产前剖宫产妇女的初次剖宫产率较高,但产时发生的剖宫产似乎与适当的风险因素和指征相关,不过由于我们未进行审核,所以不能肯定地这么说。作为一个单独的实体,需要对临产前亚组进行更多研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38a0/7487109/2699b546a3a4/OGI2020-5620987.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验