School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, Australia; UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 May;3(5):e260-70. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
Rates of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide, but the determinants of this increase, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, are controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyse the contribution of specific obstetric populations to changes in caesarean section rates, by using the Robson classification in two WHO multicountry surveys of deliveries in health-care facilities. The Robson system classifies all deliveries into one of ten groups on the basis of five parameters: obstetric history, onset of labour, fetal lie, number of neonates, and gestational age.
We studied deliveries in 287 facilities in 21 countries that were included in both the WHO Global Survey of Maternal and Perinatal Health (WHOGS; 2004-08) and the WHO Multi-Country Survey of Maternal and Newborn Health (WHOMCS; 2010-11). We used the data from these surveys to establish the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in caesarean section rates per country. Countries were stratified according to Human Development Index (HDI) group (very high/high, medium, or low) and the Robson criteria were applied to both datasets. We report the relative size of each Robson group, the caesarean section rate in each Robson group, and the absolute and relative contributions made by each to the overall caesarean section rate.
The caesarean section rate increased overall between the two surveys (from 26.4% in the WHOGS to 31.2% in the WHOMCS, p=0.003) and in all countries except Japan. Use of obstetric interventions (induction, prelabour caesarean section, and overall caesarean section) increased over time. Caesarean section rates increased across most Robson groups in all HDI categories. Use of induction and prelabour caesarean section increased in very high/high and low HDI countries, and the caesarean section rate after induction in multiparous women increased significantly across all HDI groups. The proportion of women who had previously had a caesarean section increased in moderate and low HDI countries, as did the caesarean section rate in these women.
Use of the Robson criteria allows standardised comparisons of data across countries and timepoints and identifies the subpopulations driving changes in caesarean section rates. Women who have previously had a caesarean section are an increasingly important determinant of overall caesarean section rates in countries with a moderate or low HDI. Strategies to reduce the frequency of the procedure should include avoidance of medically unnecessary primary caesarean section. Improved case selection for induction and prelabour caesarean section could also reduce caesarean section rates.
None.
全世界剖宫产手术的比例正在上升,但这种增长的决定因素,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家,存在争议。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过使用世卫组织在两个医疗机构分娩的多国调查中的 Robson 分类,分析特定产科人群对剖宫产率变化的贡献。Robson 系统根据五个参数将所有分娩分为十组之一:产科史、分娩开始、胎儿位置、新生儿数量和胎龄。
我们研究了 21 个国家的 287 个设施中的分娩情况,这些国家都包括在世卫组织全球孕产妇和围产儿健康调查(世卫组织全球调查;2004-08 年)和世卫组织多国孕产妇和新生儿健康调查(世卫组织多国调查;2010-11 年)中。我们使用这些调查的数据来确定每个国家的剖宫产率的平均年百分比变化(AAPC)。根据人类发展指数(HDI)组(极高/高、中或低)对国家进行分层,并对两个数据集应用 Robson 标准。我们报告每个 Robson 组的相对大小、每个 Robson 组中的剖宫产率以及每个组对总剖宫产率的绝对和相对贡献。
两次调查之间(从世卫组织全球调查中的 26.4%到世卫组织多国调查中的 31.2%,p=0.003)和所有国家(日本除外)的剖宫产率均总体上升。产科干预措施(引产、产前剖宫产和总剖宫产)的使用随时间增加。在所有 HDI 类别中,大多数 Robson 组的剖宫产率都有所增加。在极高/高和低 HDI 国家,引产和产前剖宫产的使用增加,多产妇引产后的剖宫产率在所有 HDI 组中显著增加。中低 HDI 国家中,有过剖宫产史的妇女比例增加,这些妇女的剖宫产率也增加。
使用 Robson 标准可以在国家和时间点之间对数据进行标准化比较,并确定推动剖宫产率变化的亚人群。在中低 HDI 国家,有过剖宫产史的妇女是剖宫产率总体的一个越来越重要的决定因素。为减少该手术的频率,应避免不必要的初次剖宫产。改进引产和产前剖宫产的病例选择也可以降低剖宫产率。
无。