• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米赞-泰皮大学教学医院有剖宫产史女性的分娩方式

Mode of Delivery Among Women with a History of Prior Cesarean Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital.

作者信息

Harrison Margo S, Liyew Tewodros, Kirub Ephrem, Teshome Biruk, Jimenez-Zambrano Andrea, Muldrow Margaret, Yarinbab Teklemariam

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, USA.

Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Aman, Bench Maji Zone, Ethiopia.

出版信息

J Womens Health Dev. 2021 Mar;4(1):001-9. doi: 10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840055. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

DOI:10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840055
PMID:33629077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7899178/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to observe mode of delivery among women with a history of prior cesarean birth.

METHODS

After collecting data on a convenience sample of 1,000 women giving birth at 28 weeks gestation or greater at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, we reduced the sample to only include women with a history of prior cesarean birth. We wanted to observe mode of delivery among this cohort and determine if any characteristics were associated with elective repeat cesarean birth, as compared to vaginal birth after cesarean.

RESULTS

Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on history of prior cesarean birth was missing on 2 women (0.2%). Of the remaining women, 49 (4.9%) reported a history of prior cesarean; 44 (89.8%) reported one prior cesarean and 5 (10.2%) women had two prior cesarean births. Repeat cesarean birth occurred in 65.1% (n = 29/44) of women with one prior cesarean and in 80.0% (n = 4/5) of women with two prior surgeries. Among the total cohort of women with a history of prior cesarean birth, of those who experienced repeat cesarean birth (n = 33), 27.3% (n = 9) occurred pre-labor, 69.7% (n = 23) occurred intrapartum after the onset of spontaneous labor, and 3.0% (n = 1) occurred intrapartum during the course of an induced or augmented labor. Labor onset and cervical exam on admission were statistically significantly different in bivariate comparisons of women who successfully achieved vaginal birth after cesarean as compared to those who gave birth by repeat cesarean birth, and postpartum maternal antibiotics were more common after repeat cesarean birth, p < 0.05. In a multivariable model of factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth was increased 15% for each increasing centimeter of dilation on a woman's admission cervical exam (RR 1.15, p= 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Almost one-third of women in our observational cohort attempted trial of labor after cesarean; those that were successful were more likely to have been more cervically dilated on their admission exam. No sociodemographic or obstetrical characteristics were more likely among women who underwent pre-labor repeat cesarean birth as compared to intrapartum cesarean birth.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是观察有剖宫产史女性的分娩方式。

方法

在收集了米赞 - 泰皮大学教学医院1000名妊娠28周及以上分娩女性的便利样本数据后,我们将样本缩小至仅包括有剖宫产史的女性。我们希望观察该队列中的分娩方式,并确定与择期再次剖宫产相比,剖宫产术后阴道分娩是否有任何特征与之相关。

结果

在我们的便利样本中的1000名女性中,有2名女性(0.2%)缺失既往剖宫产史的数据。在其余女性中,49名(4.9%)报告有既往剖宫产史;44名(89.8%)报告有一次既往剖宫产史,5名(10.2%)女性有两次既往剖宫产史。有一次既往剖宫产史的女性中,65.1%(n = 29/44)进行了再次剖宫产,有两次既往手术史的女性中,80.0%(n = 4/5)进行了再次剖宫产。在有既往剖宫产史的女性总队列中,在经历再次剖宫产的女性(n = 33)中,27.3%(n = 9)在临产前进行,69.7%(n = 23)在自然发动分娩后产时进行,3.0%(n = 1)在引产或加强宫缩的产时进行。与通过再次剖宫产分娩的女性相比,剖宫产术后成功实现阴道分娩的女性在双变量比较中,入院时的临产发动和宫颈检查在统计学上有显著差异,再次剖宫产术后产后母体使用抗生素更为常见,p < 0.05。在剖宫产术后成功阴道分娩相关因素的多变量模型中,女性入院宫颈检查时每增加1厘米的扩张,成功阴道分娩的可能性增加15%(RR 1.15,p = 0.004)。

结论

在我们的观察队列中,近三分之一有剖宫产史的女性尝试了剖宫产术后阴道试产;成功的女性在入院检查时宫颈扩张更可能更大。与产时剖宫产相比,临产前进行再次剖宫产的女性中,没有更可能出现的社会人口统计学或产科特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/7899178/2267725f5237/nihms-1664979-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/7899178/2267725f5237/nihms-1664979-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/7899178/2267725f5237/nihms-1664979-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mode of Delivery Among Women with a History of Prior Cesarean Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital.米赞-泰皮大学教学医院有剖宫产史女性的分娩方式
J Womens Health Dev. 2021 Mar;4(1):001-9. doi: 10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840055. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Birth as Compared to Vaginal Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia.埃塞俄米亚米赞-泰皮大学教学医院剖宫产与阴道分娩的相关特征及结局
J Womens Health Dev. 2021;4(2):47-63. doi: 10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840060. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia.埃塞俄米亚米赞-泰皮大学医院罗布森分类2组和4组剖宫产的使用情况。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Sep 4;2020:5620987. doi: 10.1155/2020/5620987. eCollection 2020.
4
Use of Cesarean Birth at Mizan Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia.米赞提皮大学教学医院(埃塞俄比亚米赞阿曼城)剖宫产的使用情况。
Midwifery. 2021 Jan;92:102860. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102860. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Predicting obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in patients who undergo vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.预测剖宫产术后经阴道分娩患者的产科肛门括约肌损伤。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):173.e1-173.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Vaginal delivery after caesarean section and its associated factors in Mizan Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部米赞泰皮大学教学医院剖宫产术后阴道分娩及其相关因素
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 27;7(11):e08276. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08276. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Attempted operative vaginal delivery vs repeat cesarean in the second stage among women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后经阴道试产的女性在第二产程中尝试阴道手术分娩与再次剖宫产的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):407.e1-407.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
8
Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩失败:风险有多大?I. 孕产妇发病率
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.115044.
9
The association of timing of repeat cesarean with outcomes among a cohort of Guatemalan women with a history of prior cesarean birth.在有剖宫产史的危地马拉女性队列中,重复剖宫产时机与结局的关联。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04000-3.
10
Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:预测成功率及失败风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Jun;15(6):388-93. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001724290.

引用本文的文献

1
The Preferences of Modes of Child Delivery and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women in Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部孕妇的分娩方式偏好及相关因素
Pragmat Obs Res. 2022 Jul 15;13:59-73. doi: 10.2147/POR.S370513. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean birth in the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research: trends in utilization, risk factors, and subgroups with high cesarean birth rates.全球妇女儿童健康研究网络中的剖宫产:利用趋势、风险因素和剖宫产率较高的亚组。
Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(Suppl 3):165. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01021-7.
2
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第 205 号:剖宫产后的阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.
3
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request.
美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.761:产妇要求剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):e73-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003006.
4
Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity.前次剖宫产分娩后的分娩方式,以及相关的母儿发病率。
CMAJ. 2018 May 7;190(18):E556-E564. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170371.
5
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.
6
Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?入院时可获得的信息是否能提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩的预测准确性?
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Nov;26(10):693-701. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239494. Epub 2009 Oct 7.