Zhang Qi, Wang Ying, Tao Shiqi, Bilsborrow Richard E, Qiu Tong, Liu Chong, Sannigrahi Srikanta, Li Qirui, Song Conghe
Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China.
Ecosyst Serv. 2020 Oct;45. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101167. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
China's Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP) is one of the world's largest Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs. Its socioeconomic-ecological effects are of great interest to both scholars and policy-makers. However, little is known about how the socioeconomic-ecological outcomes of CCFP differ across geographic regions. This study integrates household survey data, satellite imagery, and statistical models to examine labor migration and forest dynamics under CCFP. The investigation is carried out at two mountainous sites with distinct biophysical and socioeconomic conditions, one in a subtropical mountainous region (Anhui) and the other in the semi-arid Loess Plateau (Shanxi). We found divergent CCFP outcomes on migration behavior, stimulating both local- and distant-migration in the Anhui site while discouraging distant-migration in the Shanxi site, after controlling for factors at the individual, household, community and regional levels. Forest recovery is positively associated with distant-migration in Anhui but with local-migration in Shanxi. Contextual factors interact with demographic-socioeconomic factors to influence household livelihoods in both areas, leading to various socio-ecological pathways from CCFP participation to enhanced forest sustainability. Regional differences should therefore be taken into account in the design of future large-scale PES programs.
中国的退耕还林工程是世界上规模最大的生态系统服务付费(PES)项目之一。其社会经济生态效应受到学者和政策制定者的广泛关注。然而,对于退耕还林工程的社会经济生态成果在不同地理区域如何存在差异,人们了解甚少。本研究整合了家庭调查数据、卫星图像和统计模型,以考察退耕还林工程下的劳动力迁移和森林动态变化。调查在两个生物物理和社会经济条件不同的山区开展,一个位于亚热带山区(安徽),另一个位于半干旱黄土高原(山西)。在控制了个体、家庭、社区和区域层面的因素后,我们发现退耕还林工程在迁移行为上产生了不同的结果,在安徽地区促进了本地和远距离迁移,而在山西地区抑制了远距离迁移。森林恢复在安徽与远距离迁移呈正相关,而在山西与本地迁移呈正相关。背景因素与人口社会经济因素相互作用,影响了两个地区的家庭生计,从而导致了从参与退耕还林工程到增强森林可持续性的各种社会生态路径。因此,在未来大规模生态系统服务付费项目的设计中应考虑区域差异。