Suppr超能文献

农村生计的韧性建设在 PES 项目中:来自中国黄土丘陵区的案例研究。

Resilience building of rural livelihoods in PES programmes: A case study in China's Loess Hills.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany.

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), EberswalderStraße 84, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany.

出版信息

Ambio. 2020 Apr;49(4):962-985. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01236-4. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

Abstract

In spite of positive expectations for environmental protection, payments for ecosystem services (PES) can bring about unintended disturbances to rural livelihoods. Based on resilience thinking, this article investigates livelihood resilience building at farm level through the interaction between farm adaptation and disturbances induced by China's Grain for Green project (GGP). Cluster analysis was conducted to investigate the complexity and diversity of farm adaptation; the crafting of composite indexes was designed to value resilience through disturbance, sensitivity, and adaptability; regression analyses linked the resilience indexes and farm adaptation with access to resources. The results show three adaptation typologies (i.e. reclamation of retired lands, contractive farming, and expansive farming) with distinct land use structures and resilience scores, and highlight the need to improving farmers' access and endowment of tangible (e.g. farming facilities) and intangible resources (e.g. skill training) for resilience-building practices in light of the GGP. The findings imply that policy interventions combining environmental restrictions with widening resource access to support alternative livelihoods can offset the unintended effects and amplify the success of PES programmes.

摘要

尽管人们对环境保护抱有积极的期望,但生态系统服务付费可能会给农村生计带来意想不到的干扰。本文基于弹性思维,通过考察中国退耕还林工程(GGP)引起的农场适应与干扰之间的相互作用,研究了农场层面的生计弹性建设。通过聚类分析,研究了农场适应的复杂性和多样性;设计了综合指标来衡量通过干扰、敏感性和适应性的弹性;回归分析将弹性指标与农场适应与资源获取联系起来。结果表明,有三种适应类型(即开垦休耕地、集约耕作和扩张耕作),具有不同的土地利用结构和弹性得分,并强调需要提高农民对有形资源(如农业设施)和无形资源(如技能培训)的获取和赋予,以建立弹性,以应对 GGP 的影响。研究结果表明,将环境限制与扩大资源获取相结合的政策干预措施,以支持替代生计,可以抵消生态系统服务付费计划的意外影响,放大其成功。

相似文献

1
Resilience building of rural livelihoods in PES programmes: A case study in China's Loess Hills.
Ambio. 2020 Apr;49(4):962-985. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01236-4. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Survey data on livelihood assets, activities and outcomes of smallholder farm households in China's Loess Plateau.
Data Brief. 2021 Nov 25;39:107638. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107638. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services.
Ambio. 2019 Jul;48(7):732-740. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1105-0. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
Rural households' livelihood adaptation strategies in the face of changing climate: A case study from Pakistan.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 12;10(6):e28003. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28003. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
7
Effects of social interactions and information bias on the willingness to pay for transboundary basin ecosystem services.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 15;296:113233. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113233. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
[Dependence of farmers' livelihoods on environmental resource in key ecological function area: A case study of Gannan Plateau, China].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Feb;31(2):554-562. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202002.016.
9
Are Farmers in National Park Communities Willing to Reallocate Their Lands? A Situational Analysis.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;19(14):8589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148589.

本文引用的文献

1
From poverty trap to ecosystem service curse.
Sustain Sci. 2016;11(6):903-907. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0370-8. Epub 2016 May 10.
2
Flood protection and endogenous sorting of households: the role of credit constraints.
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(2):147-168. doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9667-7. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
3
Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy.
Ambio. 2018 Feb;47(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0939-1. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Universal resilience patterns in complex networks.
Nature. 2016 Feb 18;530(7590):307-12. doi: 10.1038/nature16948.
5
Value of ecosystem hydropower service and its impact on the payment for ecosystem services.
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 15;472:338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
6
The historical dynamics of social-ecological traps.
Ambio. 2014 Apr;43(3):260-74. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0419-1. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 15.
8
The Prospects for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Vietnam: A Look at Three Payment Schemes.
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2012 Apr;40(2):237-249. doi: 10.1007/s10745-012-9480-9. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
9
Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):541-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
10
Evaluating China's Slope Land Conversion Program as sustainable management in Tianquan and Wuqi Counties.
J Environ Manage. 2011 Aug;92(8):1916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验