Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):897-906. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1821103. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Everyday information and communication technologies (EICTs) are increasingly being used in our society, for both general and health-related purposes. This study aims to compare how older adults with cognitive impairment perceive relevance and level of EICT challenge between eHealth use and general use.
This cross-sectional study includes 32 participants (65-85 years of age) with cognitive impairment of different origins (due to e.g., stroke or dementia). The Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire+ (S-ETUQ+) was used, providing information about the relevance of EICTs and measuring the EICT level of challenge. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, standardized -tests and Fisher's exact tests. The significance level was set to < .05.
The result shows that the perceived amount of relevant EICTs for eHealth use was lower in all 16 EICTs compared to those of general use. About the perceived level of challenge, a significant difference was detected in one of the seven included EICTs between eHealth use and general use.
In this sample, all EICTs were perceived as having lower relevance for eHealth use compared to general use, suggesting that the purpose of using an EICT affects the perceived relevance of it. Also, once an EICT is perceived as relevant and used for eHealth purposes, there seem to be little to no differences in perceived challenge compared to the same EICT used for general purposes.Implications for rehabilitationAll stakeholders, including health care providers, need to be aware of the hindrances that come with digitalization, making it challenging to many citizens to make use of digital solutions.It is of great importance that social services including eHealth services be tailored to suit the individual/target group.Older adults may need support and an introduction to EICTs to discover the potential relevance of the specific device and/or service.
日常信息和通信技术(EICT)在我们的社会中越来越多地被用于一般和与健康相关的目的。本研究旨在比较认知障碍的老年人如何感知电子健康使用和一般使用之间的 EICT 相关性和 EICT 挑战水平。
本横断面研究包括 32 名(65-85 岁)认知障碍患者(因中风或痴呆等原因)。使用简短的日常技术使用问卷+(S-ETUQ+),提供有关 EICT 相关性的信息,并测量 EICT 挑战水平。使用描述性统计、标准化检验和 Fisher 精确检验分析数据。显著性水平设置为<0.05。
结果表明,与一般使用相比,电子健康使用的 16 种 EICT 感知相关 EICT 的数量较低。关于感知挑战水平,在包括的七种 EICT 中的一种之间,电子健康使用和一般使用之间存在显著差异。
在本样本中,与一般使用相比,所有 EICT 都被认为与电子健康使用相关性较低,这表明使用 EICT 的目的会影响对其相关性的感知。此外,一旦 EICT 被认为与电子健康相关并用于电子健康目的,与相同的 EICT 用于一般目的相比,感知挑战似乎几乎没有差异。
包括医疗保健提供者在内的所有利益相关者都需要意识到数字化带来的障碍,这使得许多公民难以使用数字解决方案。非常重要的是,包括电子健康服务在内的社会服务应根据个人/目标群体进行调整。老年人可能需要支持和介绍 EICT,以发现特定设备和/或服务的潜在相关性。