• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将 I 平方统计量扩展用于描述聚类、多中心随机试验和个体患者数据荟萃分析中的治疗效果异质性。

Extending the I-squared statistic to describe treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster, multi-centre randomized trials and individual patient data meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):376-395. doi: 10.1177/0962280220948550. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220948550
PMID:32955403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8173367/
Abstract

Treatment effect heterogeneity is commonly investigated in meta-analyses to identify if treatment effects vary across studies. When conducting an aggregate level data meta-analysis it is common to describe the magnitude of any treatment effect heterogeneity using the I-squared statistic, which is an intuitive and easily understood concept. The effect of a treatment might also vary across clusters in a cluster randomized trial, or across centres in multi-centre randomized trial, and it can be of interest to explore this at the analysis stage. In cross-over trials and other randomized designs, in which clusters or centres are exposed to both treatment and control conditions, this treatment effect heterogeneity can be identified. Here we derive and evaluate a comparable I-squared measure to describe the magnitude of heterogeneity in treatment effects across clusters or centres in randomized trials. We further show how this methodology can be used to estimate treatment effect heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis.

摘要

治疗效果异质性在荟萃分析中通常用于确定治疗效果是否在研究之间存在差异。当进行汇总水平数据荟萃分析时,通常使用 I 平方统计量来描述任何治疗效果异质性的大小,这是一个直观且易于理解的概念。在聚类随机试验中,治疗效果也可能在聚类之间存在差异,或者在多中心随机试验中,在中心之间存在差异,在分析阶段探索这一点可能很有趣。在交叉试验和其他随机设计中,聚类或中心同时暴露于治疗和对照条件下,这种治疗效果异质性可以被识别。在这里,我们推导出并评估了一个可比较的 I 平方度量来描述随机试验中聚类或中心之间治疗效果异质性的大小。我们进一步展示了如何在个体患者数据荟萃分析中使用该方法来估计治疗效果异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/8b1b42c72680/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/53f2cc1ff81e/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/dac84a305c3e/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/ff149abe8d39/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/8b1b42c72680/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/53f2cc1ff81e/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/dac84a305c3e/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/ff149abe8d39/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a7/8173367/8b1b42c72680/10.1177_0962280220948550-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Extending the I-squared statistic to describe treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster, multi-centre randomized trials and individual patient data meta-analysis.将 I 平方统计量扩展用于描述聚类、多中心随机试验和个体患者数据荟萃分析中的治疗效果异质性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):376-395. doi: 10.1177/0962280220948550. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Modeling clustering and treatment effect heterogeneity in parallel and stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.在平行和阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中建模聚类和处理效果异质性。
Stat Med. 2018 Mar 15;37(6):883-898. doi: 10.1002/sim.7553. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
5
Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: a simulation study.比较多中心随机对照试验中估计连续结局治疗效果的方法:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Feb 21;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-21.
6
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.与随机试验中评估的医疗保健结果相比,观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2.
7
Proportional hazards models with random effects to examine centre effects in multicentre cancer clinical trials.采用随机效应的比例风险模型来检验多中心癌症临床试验中的中心效应。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Jun;11(3):221-36. doi: 10.1191/0962280202sm284ra.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Frailty modelling for survival data from multi-centre clinical trials.多中心临床试验生存数据的脆弱性建模。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2144-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.4250. Epub 2011 May 12.
10
Sample size and power calculation for testing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized crossover designs.用于检验群组随机交叉设计中治疗效果异质性的样本量和功效计算。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Jul;33(7):1115-1136. doi: 10.1177/09622802241247736. Epub 2024 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
All-cause and in-hospital mortality after aspirin use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19住院患者使用阿司匹林后的全因死亡率和院内死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biol Methods Protoc. 2022 Oct 29;7(1):bpac027. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpac027. eCollection 2022.
2
Dolutegravir Monotherapy as Maintenance Strategy: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Randomized Controlled Trials.多替拉韦单药治疗作为维持策略:来自随机对照试验的个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 4;9(6):ofac107. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac107. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
An integrated approach to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes in rural Guatemala: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.在危地马拉农村改善母婴围产期结局的综合方法:一项整群随机分步试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Oct;151(1):109-116. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13262. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Quality of dietary fat and genetic risk of type 2 diabetes: individual participant data meta-analysis.膳食脂肪质量与 2 型糖尿病遗传风险:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 25;366:l4292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4292.
3
Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: an individual-participant meta-analysis.
Should intra-articular hyaluronic acid be used routinely for knee osteoarthritis pain?
关节内透明质酸是否应常规用于治疗膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛?
PM R. 2022 Jul;14(7):879-885. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12740. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
身体活动不足、心脏代谢疾病与痴呆风险:一项个体参与者荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 17;365:l1495. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1495.
4
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: what it is and when it should be used.阶梯楔形整群随机试验:是什么以及何时应使用它。
Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210(6):253-254.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50018. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Heat-Stable Carbetocin versus Oxytocin to Prevent Hemorrhage after Vaginal Birth.卡贝缩宫素与缩宫素预防阴道分娩后出血的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):743-752. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805489. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Meta-analysis of Gaussian individual patient data: Two-stage or not two-stage?基于高斯个体患者数据的荟萃分析:两阶段还是非两阶段?
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 30;37(9):1419-1438. doi: 10.1002/sim.7589. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
7
Modeling clustering and treatment effect heterogeneity in parallel and stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.在平行和阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中建模聚类和处理效果异质性。
Stat Med. 2018 Mar 15;37(6):883-898. doi: 10.1002/sim.7553. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Understanding the cluster randomised crossover design: a graphical illustraton of the components of variation and a sample size tutorial.理解整群随机交叉设计:变异成分的图形说明及样本量教程
Trials. 2017 Aug 15;18(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2113-2.
9
Small Sample Methods for Multilevel Modeling: A Colloquial Elucidation of REML and the Kenward-Roger Correction.小样本多水平建模方法:REML 和肯沃德-罗杰校正的通俗阐述。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Sep-Oct;52(5):661-670. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1344538. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
Bias and inference from misspecified mixed-effect models in stepped wedge trial analysis.阶梯楔形试验分析中错误设定的混合效应模型的偏差与推断
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 15;36(23):3670-3682. doi: 10.1002/sim.7348. Epub 2017 May 28.