• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项对比研究——骨科手术后,口服病人自控镇痛与传统疼痛药物输送的比较。

A Comparison Study-Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia Versus Traditional Delivery of Pain Medication Following Orthopaedic Procedures.

机构信息

Laurie Collins, BSN, RN, Primary Nurse, Orthopedic and Obstetrics Inpatient Units, Flagler Hospital, St. Augustine, FL.

Denise M. Cata, RN, RN-BC, Assistant Nurse, Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Flagler Hospital, St. Augustine, FL; and Staff nurse, Tennova Healthcare-Harton, Tullahoma, TN.

出版信息

Orthop Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;39(5):324-332. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000697.

DOI:10.1097/NOR.0000000000000697
PMID:32956274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic surgical patients have reported significantly lower numeric pain scores using a Wi-Fi oral patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device compared to patients receiving oral as-needed (PRN) medication by manual administration. More than 90% of nurses using the oral PCA device have agreed that the device saved them time. The manual administration of PRN pain medication is frequently delayed and consumes a significant amount of nursing time. Delays in PRN pain medication delivery have been classed as missed nursing care, called an error of omission.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this timing study was to examine if the use of the oral PCA device would reduce the nursing time to accomplish the delivery of PRN oral pain medication compared to the manual administration by nursing staff.

METHODS

Each total task for the manual and device administration of a single PRN delivery of an oral pain medication was divided into subtasks. Personal data assistant (PDA) devices were programmed to enable the collection of timing data for each subtask for both methods.

RESULTS

The manual administration time was 12.7 minutes per single dose beginning with the patient medication request and ending with pain reassessment. The oral PCA device steps to program the device, deliver one of eight doses of medication, and discharge the patient from the device required 2.06 minutes of nursing time. Reloading an additional eight-dose tray required 40 seconds of nursing time per dose of medication administered.

CONCLUSION

The oral PCA saved 84% of the nursing time to administer each dose of PRN medication manually. These data provide evidence that the oral PCA device would reduce the nursing time to deliver a single dose of PRN oral pain medication.

摘要

背景

与接受手动按需(PRN)药物治疗的患者相比,骨科手术患者使用 Wi-Fi 口腔患者自控镇痛(PCA)设备报告的数字疼痛评分显著降低。超过 90%使用口腔 PCA 设备的护士都认为该设备为他们节省了时间。PRN 疼痛药物的手动管理经常延迟,消耗大量护理时间。PRN 疼痛药物给药的延迟被归类为遗漏的护理,称为遗漏错误。

目的

本时间研究的目的是检查与护理人员手动给药相比,使用口腔 PCA 设备是否会减少完成 PRN 口服疼痛药物给药所需的护理时间。

方法

将手动和设备管理单次 PRN 口服疼痛药物给药的每个总任务分为子任务。个人数字助理(PDA)设备经过编程,能够为两种方法的每个子任务收集计时数据。

结果

从患者用药请求开始到疼痛重新评估结束,每次单剂量的手动给药管理时间为 12.7 分钟。为患者编程设备、给予八剂药物中的一剂并将患者从设备中释放所需的口腔 PCA 设备步骤需要 2.06 分钟的护理时间。每次给药额外的八剂量托盘需要 40 秒的护理时间。

结论

口腔 PCA 节省了手动管理每个 PRN 剂量药物所需护理时间的 84%。这些数据提供了证据,表明口腔 PCA 设备将减少单次 PRN 口服疼痛药物的给药护理时间。

相似文献

1
A Comparison Study-Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia Versus Traditional Delivery of Pain Medication Following Orthopaedic Procedures.一项对比研究——骨科手术后,口服病人自控镇痛与传统疼痛药物输送的比较。
Orthop Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;39(5):324-332. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000697.
2
A Prospective Randomized Trial of an Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia Device Versus Usual Care Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后口服患者自控镇痛装置与常规护理的前瞻性随机试验。
Orthop Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;39(1):37-46. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000624.
3
The traditional method of oral as-needed pain medication delivery compared to an oral patient-controlled analgesia device following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后,将口服按需止痛药物的传统方法与口服患者自控镇痛装置进行比较。
Orthop Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;33(4):217-23: 224-5. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000065.
4
Nursing time study for the administration of a PRN oral analgesic on an orthopedic postoperative unit.骨科术后病房按需口服镇痛药给药的护理时间研究。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Sep;15(3):603-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
5
Nurses' Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Use of Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia.护士对使用口服患者自控镇痛的认知与态度
Pain Manag Nurs. 2016 Apr;17(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.02.051. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
6
Clinical staff resource use with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in acute postoperative pain management: results from a multicenter, prospective, observational study.急性术后疼痛管理中静脉自控镇痛的临床工作人员资源利用:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究的结果
J Perianesth Nurs. 2007 Aug;22(4):243-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2007.05.007.
7
Evaluation of an oral patient-controlled analgesia device for pain management in oncology inpatients.评估一种用于肿瘤住院患者疼痛管理的口服患者自控镇痛装置。
J Support Oncol. 2007 Oct;5(9):443-8.
8
Impact of patient-controlled analgesia on required nursing time and duration of postoperative recovery.患者自控镇痛对所需护理时间及术后恢复时长的影响。
Reg Anesth. 1995 Nov-Dec;20(6):506-14.
9
Do Elderly Patients Use Patient-Controlled Analgesia Medication Delivery Systems Correctly?老年患者是否正确使用患者自控镇痛药物输送系统?
Orthop Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;34(4):203-8; quiz 209-10. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000159.
10
Nursing knowledge and beliefs regarding patient-controlled oral analgesia (PCOA).关于患者自控口服镇痛(PCOA)的护理知识与信念。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Dec;14(4):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 6.