• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者是否正确使用患者自控镇痛药物输送系统?

Do Elderly Patients Use Patient-Controlled Analgesia Medication Delivery Systems Correctly?

作者信息

Brown Amanda, Boshers Bridget, Chapman Lindsey Floyd, Huckaba Kim, Pangle Mandi, Pogue Lisa C, Potts Maegan, Ray Elizabeth, Thomason Nicole, Poynter Andrea, MacArthur Susan

机构信息

Amanda Brown, BSN, ONC, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Bridget Boshers, BSN, RN, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Lindsey Floyd Chapman, BSN, ONC, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Kim Huckaba, RN, ONC, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Mandi Pangle, CNT, Certified Nurse Technician, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Lisa C. Pogue, RN, CMSRN, ONC, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Maegan Potts, BSN, RN, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Elizabeth Ray, RN, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Nicole Thomason, RN, ONC, Staff Nurse, Orthopedic Unit, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Andrea Poynter, MSN, RN-BC, Clinical Educator at the time of the study, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee. Susan MacArthur, RN-BC, EdD, MSN, Director of Nursing Professional Development, Maury Regional Medical Center, Columbia, Tennessee.

出版信息

Orthop Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;34(4):203-8; quiz 209-10. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000159.

DOI:10.1097/NOR.0000000000000159
PMID:26213874
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although prior studies have shown patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to be appropriate for use by children and adults, no studies have specifically evaluated the ability of elderly patients to use the technology correctly.

PURPOSE

To determine whether elderly, postoperative patients can properly use PCA devices.

METHODS

Using a descriptive study design, a convenience sample of elderly, postoperative orthopedic patients was observed while using a PCA device and surveyed about the proper use of the device. Participants were observed and surveyed 12 to 20 hours after admission to the postoperative patient care unit. Frequency and amount of analgesic medication administration over the postoperative time period were also recorded. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether confounding variables explained problems using the PCA device correctly.

RESULTS

A total of 58 orthopedic patients were studied during the first day after surgery. Patients had used the PCA device for 16.6 ± 3.0 (mean ±SD) hours at the time of the observation and survey. Virtually all patients correctly identified and depressed the PCA activation button when instructed, knew when to use the PCA device, and who was allowed to depress the PCA button. Slightly more than half of the patients (57%) correctly identified how often they could have PCA medication, with 38% not sure of PCA medication frequency. The PCA medication was requested an average of 23.3 ± 52.7 times during the study period. The majority of the patients (86%) requested PCA medication less than 25% of the times that they could receive PCA medication. All patients in the study had PCA devices programmed to deliver up to 5 doses per hour of PCA medication, yet an average of 11.2 ± 10.8 doses of PCA medication were actually delivered during the entire study period (average 16.6 hours). Average doses of fentanyl and morphine sulfate received by patients were 13.5 μg/hour and 1.0 mg/hour, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients were very knowledgeable about how to use the PCA device but not about how often they could receive PCA medication. This lack of knowledge may have influenced how often they requested pain medication, because almost 90% of patients received less than 25% of the PCA allowable medication dose. This low usage of PCA medication delivery calls into question the cost-effectiveness of this method of medication delivery for the elderly. Additional studies are needed to verify these findings in other elderly patients.

摘要

背景

尽管先前的研究表明患者自控镇痛(PCA)适用于儿童和成人,但尚无研究专门评估老年患者正确使用该技术的能力。

目的

确定老年术后患者能否正确使用PCA设备。

方法

采用描述性研究设计,对老年骨科术后患者的便利样本在使用PCA设备时进行观察,并就该设备的正确使用进行调查。在患者入住术后护理单元12至20小时后对其进行观察和调查。还记录了术后期间镇痛药物的使用频率和用量。数据用描述性统计进行总结,并使用多元回归分析来确定混杂变量是否能解释正确使用PCA设备时出现的问题。

结果

在术后第一天共研究了58名骨科患者。在观察和调查时,患者使用PCA设备的时间为16.6±3.0(均值±标准差)小时。几乎所有患者在得到指示时都能正确识别并按下PCA激活按钮,知道何时使用PCA设备以及谁可以按下PCA按钮。略多于一半的患者(57%)正确识别了他们可以使用PCA药物的频率,38%的患者不确定PCA药物的使用频率。在研究期间,PCA药物的请求平均为23.3±52.7次。大多数患者(86%)请求使用PCA药物的次数不到他们可以接受PCA药物次数的25%。研究中的所有患者的PCA设备都设置为每小时最多提供5剂PCA药物,但在整个研究期间(平均16.6小时)实际平均提供了11.2±10.8剂PCA药物。患者接受的芬太尼和硫酸吗啡的平均剂量分别为13.5微克/小时和1.0毫克/小时。

结论

老年患者对如何使用PCA设备非常了解,但对他们可以接受PCA药物的频率了解不足。这种知识的缺乏可能影响了他们请求止痛药物的频率,因为几乎90%的患者接受的PCA允许药物剂量不到25%。PCA药物输送的这种低使用率让人质疑这种药物输送方法对老年人的成本效益。需要进一步的研究来在其他老年患者中验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
Do Elderly Patients Use Patient-Controlled Analgesia Medication Delivery Systems Correctly?老年患者是否正确使用患者自控镇痛药物输送系统?
Orthop Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;34(4):203-8; quiz 209-10. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000159.
2
Pediatric PCA: the role of concurrent opioid infusions and nurse-controlled analgesia.儿科患者自控镇痛:同时使用阿片类药物输注和护士控制镇痛的作用
Clin J Pain. 1993 Mar;9(1):26-33.
3
An audit of acute pain service in Central, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯中部急性疼痛服务的审计。
Saudi Med J. 2005 Feb;26(2):298-305.
4
Efficacy and adverse effects of patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia after major surgery.大手术后患者自控硬膜外或静脉镇痛的疗效及不良反应
Chang Gung Med J. 2004 Dec;27(12):877-86.
5
Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial.患者自控经皮盐酸芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡泵用于术后镇痛的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1333-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1333.
6
Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following orthopedic surgery: A pooled analysis of randomized, controlled trials.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于骨科手术后疼痛管理的比较:随机对照试验的汇总分析
J Opioid Manag. 2016 Jan-Feb;12(1):37-45. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0310.
7
System-related events and analgesic gaps during postoperative pain management with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.使用芬太尼离子导入透皮系统和吗啡静脉自控镇痛进行术后疼痛管理期间的系统相关事件和镇痛间隙。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1437-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281442.36582.81.
8
A Comparison Study-Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia Versus Traditional Delivery of Pain Medication Following Orthopaedic Procedures.一项对比研究——骨科手术后,口服病人自控镇痛与传统疼痛药物输送的比较。
Orthop Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;39(5):324-332. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000697.
9
Physical therapists' perceptions of ease of care in patients receiving 2 forms of analgesia after total hip arthroplasty.物理治疗师对全髋关节置换术后接受 2 种镇痛形式的患者的护理便利性的看法。
Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):707-13. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080323. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
10
Increasing patient knowledge on the proper usage of a PCA machine with the use of a post-operative instructional card.通过使用术后指导卡,提高患者对PCA机器正确使用方法的认知。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016;44(2):71-5. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1149015. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Update on Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain.急性术后疼痛患者自控镇痛的临床进展
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;10(1):22. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10010022.