Mandelbaum Jennifer, Harrison Sayward E, Brittingham Jordan
SC SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Child Obes. 2020 Oct;16(7):520-526. doi: 10.1089/chi.2020.0025. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
In 2007, an Expert Committee recommended that dietary patterns be assessed at each wellness visit and that counseling on diet and nutrition be provided to all children. Few studies have examined the "uptake" of obesity prevention practices into pediatric primary care. This study aimed to describe patterns of nutrition counseling among children at wellness visits in South Carolina between 2008 and 2017 and determine whether sociodemographic disparities existed. The sample included 123,864 children 2-18 years of age who had a wellness visit at one of South Carolina's four major health care systems between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Documentation of nutrition counseling was defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 codes. A matched sample design and conditional logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic disparities in children who did and did not receive nutrition counseling. Nutrition counseling was documented at 3.55% of wellness visits. Significant sociodemographic disparities were found, including that African American and Hispanic children were less likely to receive counseling than white or non-Hispanic children. Differences were also found by urban/rural residence, health insurance, and BMI. Despite guidelines, ICD 9/10 code indicating diagnosis of overweight or obesity was documented for only 12.2% of children. Nutrition counseling was rarely documented in a large sample of electronic medical record (EMR) data from pediatric wellness visits in South Carolina-a state heavily burdened by childhood obesity. Children's BMIs were infrequently recorded, which may be a barrier to tracking BMI over time. Sociodemographic and geographic differences in nutrition counseling may exacerbate disparities in childhood obesity.
2007年,一个专家委员会建议在每次健康检查时评估饮食模式,并为所有儿童提供饮食和营养咨询。很少有研究考察肥胖预防措施在儿科初级保健中的“采用情况”。本研究旨在描述2008年至2017年南卡罗来纳州儿童健康检查期间营养咨询的模式,并确定是否存在社会人口统计学差异。样本包括2008年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间在南卡罗来纳州四个主要医疗保健系统之一进行健康检查的123,864名2至18岁儿童。营养咨询的记录由国际疾病分类(ICD)-9/10编码定义。采用匹配样本设计和条件逻辑回归来研究接受和未接受营养咨询的儿童的社会人口统计学差异。在3.55%的健康检查中记录了营养咨询。发现了显著的社会人口统计学差异,包括非裔美国儿童和西班牙裔儿童比白人或非西班牙裔儿童接受咨询的可能性更小。在城市/农村居住、医疗保险和体重指数方面也发现了差异。尽管有指南,但仅12.2%的儿童有ICD 9/10编码表明诊断为超重或肥胖。在南卡罗来纳州这个儿童肥胖负担沉重的州,大量儿科健康检查电子病历(EMR)数据中很少记录营养咨询。儿童的体重指数很少被记录,这可能是长期跟踪体重指数的一个障碍。营养咨询中的社会人口统计学和地理差异可能会加剧儿童肥胖的差异。