Lundborg G, Dahlin L B, Danielsen N, Nachemson A K
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;20(3):279-83. doi: 10.3109/02844318609004486.
In 1944 Weiss & Taylor presented experimental evidence against "neurotropism" in nerve regeneration. We used a silicone Y-chamber system to repeat some of those experiments. The proximal stump of transected rat sciatic nerve was introduced into the proximal inlet of the Y. One of the distal outlets was left empty, plugged or occupied by a tendon graft, the other outlet being occupied by a nerve graft. Analysis after 4 and 12 weeks showed in all cases a preferential or exclusive axonal growth towards the nerve piece. The results, indicating the existence of "tissue specificity", are contradictory to the results reported by Weiss & Taylor (30). The findings are discussed with respect to possible influence of humoral, cellular and molecular factors associated with the distal nerve stump as well as the matrix, formed between both nerve segments.
1944年,魏斯和泰勒提出了反对神经再生中“神经嗜性”的实验证据。我们使用硅胶Y形腔系统重复了其中一些实验。将横断的大鼠坐骨神经近端残端插入Y形腔的近端入口。其中一个远端出口保持空着、堵塞或被肌腱移植物占据,另一个出口被神经移植物占据。4周和12周后的分析表明,在所有情况下,轴突都优先或排他地向神经段生长。这些结果表明存在“组织特异性”,与魏斯和泰勒报道的结果相矛盾(30)。结合与远端神经残端相关的体液、细胞和分子因素以及两个神经段之间形成的基质的可能影响,对这些发现进行了讨论。