Mosimann F, Chamero J
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Apr 11;117(15):570-3.
Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colonic surgery is of established value and most authors have proposed an association of at least two drugs. We have compared the efficacy of classical prophylaxis (clindamycin and gentamicin, C + G) with that of the single drug cefoxitin (Ce). 101 consecutive patients were covered; 22 had to be excluded and 7 withdrawn after randomization; 72 cases were left for final analysis (C + G 35; Ce 37). Five C + G (14.2%) and 4 Ce cases (10.8%) developed septic complications, possibly caused by opening of the colon (wound infection, anastomotic failure, colocutaneous fistula): this difference is not statistically significant. Episodes of sepsis, urinary tract infection and pneumonia were similar in both groups. Although the number of patients included is relatively small, we conclude that prophylaxis with Ce alone appears to be as effective as double drug prophylaxis with C + G.
选择性结肠手术中的抗生素预防具有确定的价值,大多数作者建议联合使用至少两种药物。我们比较了经典预防方案(克林霉素和庆大霉素,C+G)与单一药物头孢西丁(Ce)的疗效。连续纳入101例患者;随机分组后,22例必须排除,7例退出;最终分析留下72例(C+G组35例;Ce组37例)。5例C+G组患者(14.2%)和4例Ce组患者(10.8%)发生了可能由结肠开放引起的感染性并发症(伤口感染、吻合口漏、结肠皮肤瘘):这种差异无统计学意义。两组的败血症、尿路感染和肺炎发作情况相似。虽然纳入的患者数量相对较少,但我们得出结论,单独使用Ce预防似乎与C+G联合预防一样有效。