Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Apr;120(4):1121-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Practical barriers exist in applying threshold-concept-based clinical teaching. We applied the practice model to the subject of acute liver failure and reported the experiences in teaching and learners' reactions.
The course comprised a 10-min online preclass video and a 1-h class with in-depth discussion. The video explained six extracted threshold concepts, which were labelled TC1-TC6. Three sets of feedback questionnaires were given to students. Questionnaires were provided after they watched the online video (Q1), after class (Q2), and before the end of the curriculum section (Q3). All the feedback questionnaires were analysed.
Of the 136 attendees in the academic year 2018, 127 (93.4%), 69 (50.7%), and 112 (82.4%) completed the Q1, Q2, and Q3 questionnaires, respectively, and 48 (42.6%) provided comments. The degree of comprehension varied among threshold concepts and individual students. TC1 and TC2 were viewed as transformative for all three surveys. The threshold-concept-based learning process was satisfactory, and students could auto-reflect on the defining features of a threshold concept. Students became aware of their deficiencies in knowledge and acknowledged room for development with regard to their mindset for future patient management.
Threshold-concept-based clinical teaching is a feasible strategy. Students' reflections indicate that thresholds were crossed, which does not guarantee that students' mindsets are ready for future clinical practice.
在应用基于阈概念的临床教学时存在实际障碍。我们将实践模型应用于急性肝衰竭科目,并报告了教学经验和学习者的反应。
该课程包括 10 分钟的在线预习视频和 1 小时的深入讨论课。视频解释了六个提取的阈概念,分别标记为 TC1-TC6。学生们收到了三套反馈问卷。学生们在观看完在线视频后(Q1)、课后(Q2)和课程结束前(Q3)分别提交了问卷。对所有反馈问卷进行了分析。
在 2018 学年的 136 名参加者中,分别有 127 人(93.4%)、69 人(50.7%)和 112 人(82.4%)完成了 Q1、Q2 和 Q3 问卷,其中 48 人(42.6%)提供了意见。阈概念和个别学生之间的理解程度存在差异。TC1 和 TC2 在三个调查中都被认为具有变革性。基于阈概念的学习过程是令人满意的,学生可以自动反思阈概念的定义特征。学生们意识到自己在知识上的不足,并承认在未来的患者管理方面,他们的思维模式还有待发展。
基于阈概念的临床教学是一种可行的策略。学生的反思表明,他们已经跨越了阈,但这并不能保证他们的思维模式已经为未来的临床实践做好了准备。