Kunkanjanawan Hataiwan, Kunkanjanawan Tanut, Khemarangsan Veerapol, Yodsheewan Rungrueang, Theerakittayakorn Kasem, Parnpai Rangsun
Medeze Research and Development Co., Ltd, 28/9 Moo 8, Phutthamonthon Sai 4 Rd., Krathum Lom, Sam Phran, Nakhon Pathom 73220, Thailand.
Medeze Stem Cell Co., Ltd, 28/9 Moo 8, Phutthamonthon Sai 4 Rd., Krathum Lom, Sam Phran, Nakhon Pathom 73220, Thailand.
Stem Cells Int. 2020 Sep 7;2020:8832052. doi: 10.1155/2020/8832052. eCollection 2020.
Coimplantation of endothelial cells (ECs) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into the transplantation site could be a feasible option to achieve a sufficient level of graft-host vascularization. To find a suitable source of tissue that provides a large number of high-quality ECs and MSCs suited for future clinical application, we developed a simplified xeno-free strategy for isolation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (WJ-MSCs) from the same umbilical cord. We also assessed whether the coculture of HUVECs and WJ-MSCs derived from the same umbilical cord (autogenic cell source) or from different umbilical cords (allogenic cell sources) had an impact on angiogenic capacity. We found that HUVECs grown in 5 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF) supplemented xeno-free condition showed higher proliferation potential compared to other conditions. HUVECs and WJ-MSCs obtained from this technic show an endothelial lineage (CD31 and von Willebrand factor) and MSC (CD73, CD90, and CD105) immunophenotype characteristic with high purity, respectively. It was also found that only the coculture of HUVEC/WJ-MSC, but not HUVEC or WJ-MSC mono-culture, provides a positive effect on vessel-like structure (VLS) formation, . Further investigations are needed to clarify the pros and cons of using autogenic or allogenic source of EC/MSC in tissue engineering applications. To the best of our knowledge, this study offers a simple, but reliable, xeno-free strategy to establish ECs and MSCs from the same umbilical cord, a new opportunity to facilitate the development of personal cell-based therapy.
将内皮细胞(ECs)和间充质基质细胞(MSCs)共同植入移植部位可能是实现足够水平的移植物-宿主血管化的可行选择。为了找到一个合适的组织来源,以提供大量适合未来临床应用的高质量ECs和MSCs,我们开发了一种简化的无动物源策略,用于从同一脐带中分离人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVECs)和华通氏胶来源的间充质基质细胞(WJ-MSCs)。我们还评估了来自同一脐带(自体细胞来源)或不同脐带(异体细胞来源)的HUVECs和WJ-MSCs共培养是否会对血管生成能力产生影响。我们发现,在添加5 ng/ml表皮生长因子(EGF)的无动物源条件下培养的HUVECs与其他条件相比具有更高的增殖潜力。通过这种技术获得的HUVECs和WJ-MSCs分别显示出具有高纯度的内皮细胞谱系(CD31和血管性血友病因子)和MSC(CD73、CD90和CD105)免疫表型特征。还发现,只有HUVEC/WJ-MSC共培养,而不是HUVEC或WJ-MSC单培养,对血管样结构(VLS)形成有积极影响。需要进一步研究以阐明在组织工程应用中使用EC/MSC自体或异体来源的优缺点。据我们所知,本研究提供了一种简单但可靠的无动物源策略,用于从同一脐带中建立ECs和MSCs,为促进基于个人细胞的治疗发展提供了新机会。